2018
DOI: 10.2996/kmj/1521424825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twisted Alexander polynomials of genus one two-bridge knots

Abstract: Morifuji [Mo2] computed the twisted Alexander polynomial of twist knots for nonabelian representations. In this paper we compute the twisted Alexander polynomial and the Reidemeister torsion of genus one two-bridge knots, a class of knots which includes twist knots. As an application, we give a formula for the Reidemeister torsion of the 3-manifold obtained by a Dehn surgery on a genus one two-bridge knot.2010 Mathematics Classification: Primary 57N10. Secondary 57M25.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [17], explicit volume formulae for the link 7 2 3 (α, α) cone-manifolds are computed. In [49,50], explicit volume formulae for double twist knot cone-manifolds and double twist link cone-manifolds are introduced without explicit computations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [17], explicit volume formulae for the link 7 2 3 (α, α) cone-manifolds are computed. In [49,50], explicit volume formulae for double twist knot cone-manifolds and double twist link cone-manifolds are introduced without explicit computations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tran's result [56, Theorem 1] that we cited for twist knots in Proposition 8.4 is originally stated for general two‐bridge knots with genus 1. Although his assertion is stated for representations over C${\mathbb {C}}$, the argument makes sense over Z${\mathbb {Z}}$, and hence it is applicable to the case over any field.…”
Section: μ=0$\mu =0$ For Sl2${\rm Sl}_2$‐representations Of Twist Knotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose ρ : π 1 (K) → SL 2 (C) is a nonabelian representation. Up to conjugation, we may assume that The formulas in the following proposition are taken from [19].…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%