2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep08(2021)009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twin Higgs portal dark matter

Abstract: Many minimal models of dark matter (DM) or canonical solutions to the hierarchy problem are either excluded or severely constrained by LHC and direct detection null results. In particular, Higgs Portal Dark Matter (HPDM) features a scalar coupling to the Higgs via a quartic interaction, and obtaining the measured relic density via thermal freeze-out gives definite direct detection predictions which are now almost entirely excluded. The Twin Higgs solves the little hierarchy problem without coloured top partner… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Appendix D we consider different non-zero initial conditions C 6 (µ * ) and C H□ (µ * ). Notice that the chosen f corresponds to the minimal value in twin-Higgs models that is consistent with existing experimental measurement, necessitating v/ f ≲ 1/3 [73]. Since the tuning amounts to roughly 2v 2 / f 2 in minimal twin-Higgs models [38,74] the choice of f = 3v implies only a very modest tuning of around 20% -we repeat our study for a more tuned twin-Higgs model in Appendix B.…”
Section: Vbf Higgs Productionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In Appendix D we consider different non-zero initial conditions C 6 (µ * ) and C H□ (µ * ). Notice that the chosen f corresponds to the minimal value in twin-Higgs models that is consistent with existing experimental measurement, necessitating v/ f ≲ 1/3 [73]. Since the tuning amounts to roughly 2v 2 / f 2 in minimal twin-Higgs models [38,74] the choice of f = 3v implies only a very modest tuning of around 20% -we repeat our study for a more tuned twin-Higgs model in Appendix B.…”
Section: Vbf Higgs Productionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Assuming that the universe reheated above this temperature with otherwise typical cosmological evolution, the energy density in mirror photons and neutrinos corresponds to Δ𝑁 eff ≈ 5.6, such that the simplest mirror Twin Higgs is badly excluded by current bounds on Δ𝑁 eff . There are then two broad possibilities consistent with current bounds: either the Twin sector is not an exact mirror copy (such that the Twin partners of the photon and neutrinos are heavy or decoupled [150][151][152]), or the energy densities in the Standard Model and Twin sector differ significantly in the early universe [96,97,153]. While the former possibility can be arranged, it requires understanding why the ℤ 2 symmetry is good for particles that couple strongly to the Higgs but bad for particles that do not.…”
Section: Twin Higgsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…At the same time, the Twin Higgs model can be consistent with cosmology, which is already the subject of a considerable literature [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. 1 In a similar fashion to the Higgs signal strengths, the cosmology of the Twin Higgs also requires Z 2 breaking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%