2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2009.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twin disc micropitting tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the surface roughness of the discs was reduced with polishing process no micropitting was observed due to more evenly distributes contact loads. This is in correlation with the previous twin disc studies [23]. The discs with K0.1 polishing had the lowest surface roughness and completely smooth surfaces with no grinding marks, indicating thus a more efficient polishing process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the surface roughness of the discs was reduced with polishing process no micropitting was observed due to more evenly distributes contact loads. This is in correlation with the previous twin disc studies [23]. The discs with K0.1 polishing had the lowest surface roughness and completely smooth surfaces with no grinding marks, indicating thus a more efficient polishing process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The twin disc test setup enables rolling contact with different slide-to-roll ratios and therefore is one of the rare test arrangements that can simulate the gear contact [22,23]. Different coatings evaluated in twin disc tests show that a-C:H coating provides friction reduction and superior wear performance, particularly for thick films [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review also shows how small hard inclusions can, when loaded, generate bumps, which behave similar to ridges in EHL contacts. Other studies, such as experiments by Ahlroos et al [47] and the 2 dimensional numerical simulations of cylindrical gear contacts with ridges and slip by Sharif et al [48] and Qiao et al [38] show that the damage increases with decreased lambda-ratio. These studies highlight surface roughness as important for rolling contact fatigue initiation.…”
Section: Damage Simulations In Ehlmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The factors that influence the severity of the surface stresses and consequently the fatigue life are diverse, primarily including the operating conditions (surface velocities, sliding direction, normal load, temperature) [1][2][3][4]15], the surface conditions (surface roughness, texture) [2,[16][17][18][19][20], and the lubricant properties (viscosity, non-Newtonian behavior) [9,20]. The other potential factors such as surface hardness [20], residual stresses [14], material micro-structures [21], and lubricant additives [20,22,23] may also affect the fatigue crack formation, while not through the direct alteration of the stress distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%