2020
DOI: 10.1080/17515831.2020.1829878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twin disc evaluation of third body materials in the wheel/rail interface

Abstract: Twin disc instruments are an essential tool for evaluating third body materials in the wheel/rail interface. Twin disc testing results (from two different scale instruments) were proven to correlate exceptionally well with field performance of Top of Rail products and Gauge Face greases. Furthermore, the twin disc instrument was utilized to evaluate the friction characteristics (creep curve) and Rolling Contact Fatigue (RCF) propagation potential of the TOR materials. Common environmental contaminants (leaves,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Train wheels pass through the puddle picking-up the product and then transferring it back to the rail with each subsequent contact, spreading it further down the track, as shown in Figure 2. 9 Numerous studies have investigated the influence of TOR products on wheel/ rail interface friction using a range of test rigs of different scales, such as a pin-on-disc machine; 10 a twin disc rig, 11,12 full-scale rigs (FSR) 6,13 and scaled-wheel rigs 14 and more recently a high pressure torsion rig 15 However, few studies have investigated product transfer mechanisms that dictate product are pick-up, carry-on along the track and consumption. Some work has been carried out investigating this for grease used for curve lubrication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Train wheels pass through the puddle picking-up the product and then transferring it back to the rail with each subsequent contact, spreading it further down the track, as shown in Figure 2. 9 Numerous studies have investigated the influence of TOR products on wheel/ rail interface friction using a range of test rigs of different scales, such as a pin-on-disc machine; 10 a twin disc rig, 11,12 full-scale rigs (FSR) 6,13 and scaled-wheel rigs 14 and more recently a high pressure torsion rig 15 However, few studies have investigated product transfer mechanisms that dictate product are pick-up, carry-on along the track and consumption. Some work has been carried out investigating this for grease used for curve lubrication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of components that are "artificial" include sand, oils and grease, top-of-rail friction management products, debris from road crossings 4 and freight vehicle overspill. 5 Naturally occurring, unmanaged coefficient of friction can vary between approximately 0.05 and 0.7. Typical values needed for braking are above 0.09, with 0.2 or above required for traction sufficient to maintain timetabled operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three types of test regularly carried out on friction management products; one to determine "effective friction" and "retentivity" (how long the product remains active in the contact); another for "creep curve" generation and finally a wear test. The first is most often used [6], ensuring the product meets the desired friction thresholds for operational use. Creep curves may be required if the data are to be used for modelling, for instance multi-body dynamics simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%