Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science 2005
DOI: 10.1002/0470013192.bsa694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twin Designs

Abstract: The classical twin study compares the phenotypic resemblances of identical or monozygotic (MZ) and fraternal or dizygotic (DZ) twins. MZ twins derive from the splitting of one fertilized zygote and, therefore, inherit identical genetic material. DZ twins are first‐degree relatives because they develop from separately fertilized eggs and are 50% genetically identical on average. It follows that a greater within‐pair similarity in MZ, compared to DZ twins suggests … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Articulatory analyses often involve only small subject groups, and together with the fact that we are comparing speaker pairs, the problem of a small subject group gets even more apparent. However, the potential of twin design studies are obvious regarding the insights they provide in distinguishing physiological determinants and environmental factors responsible for individual differences (Spinath, 2005;Scarr and Carter-Saltzman, 1979.) Together with analyzing inter-speaker variability in unrelated speakers, this methodology helps us to highlight the effect of individual physiology on speaker specific behavior in speech production because physiological similarity clearly increases from unrelated speakers over DZ twins to MZ twins.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Articulatory analyses often involve only small subject groups, and together with the fact that we are comparing speaker pairs, the problem of a small subject group gets even more apparent. However, the potential of twin design studies are obvious regarding the insights they provide in distinguishing physiological determinants and environmental factors responsible for individual differences (Spinath, 2005;Scarr and Carter-Saltzman, 1979.) Together with analyzing inter-speaker variability in unrelated speakers, this methodology helps us to highlight the effect of individual physiology on speaker specific behavior in speech production because physiological similarity clearly increases from unrelated speakers over DZ twins to MZ twins.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a twin pair differs in any of the 16 DNA markers, they must be dizygotic. When a reasonable number of markers (here 16) reveals no differences, it can be concluded that the twin pair is monozygotic (Spinath, 2005). An overview of the characteristics of our subjects and the influence factor genetic identity (zygosity) is given in Table I (also including other information).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that for a meaningful interpretation of twin correlations in the described manner, a number of assumptions have to be met: the absence of assortative mating for the trait in question, the absence of G(enotype) × E(nvironment) correlation and interaction, and the viability of the Equal Environments Assumption. A more detailed discussion of these assumptions as well as the effects of variation attributable to chorionicity differences is available elsewhere (Spinath, 2005), so a short introduction should suffice here:…”
Section: Theoretical and Methodological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter factor refers to social environmental factors that contribute to the resemblance between individuals who grow up in the same family. The Equal Environments Assumption (EEA) assumes that MZ and DZ twins share the same amount of environmentally caused similarity, as studies of mislabelled twin pairs have shown (Spinath, 2005).…”
Section: Twin Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a twin pair differs for any DNA marker, they must be dizygotic. When a reasonable number of markers reveal no differences, it can be concluded that the twin pair is monozygotic (Spinath, 2005).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%