2015
DOI: 10.5194/amtd-8-12051-2015
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twin-cuvette measurement technique for investigation of dry deposition of O<sub>3</sub> and PAN to plant leaves under controlled humidity conditions

Abstract: Abstract. We present a dynamic twin-cuvette system for quantifying the trace gas exchange fluxes between plants and the atmosphere under controlled temperature, light and humidity conditions. Compared with a single cuvette system, the twin-cuvette system is insensitive for disturbing background effects such as wall deposition. In combination with a climate chamber we can perform flux measurements under constant and controllable environmental conditions. With an Automatic Temperature Regulated Air Humidificatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A widely used assumption is that reactions inside the leaf do not limit stomatal ozone uptake (i.e., negligible r meso ). While some laboratory studies (Laisk et al, ; Omasa et al, ; S. Sun, Moravek, von der Heyden, et al, ; Wang et al, ) and the modeling study of Plöchl et al () suggest this assumption holds, the findings of other laboratory studies and the modeling study of Tuzet et al () suggest otherwise. In particular, laboratory findings of nonlinear relationships between stomatal uptake of water vapor and stomatal uptake of ozone (Eller & Sparks, ; Fares et al, ; Fares, Park, et al, ; Loreto & Fares, ; Tuzet et al, ) may imply nonnegligible resistance to ozone reaction inside the leaf.…”
Section: Theory Models and Observations Of Terrestrial Ozone Deposimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A widely used assumption is that reactions inside the leaf do not limit stomatal ozone uptake (i.e., negligible r meso ). While some laboratory studies (Laisk et al, ; Omasa et al, ; S. Sun, Moravek, von der Heyden, et al, ; Wang et al, ) and the modeling study of Plöchl et al () suggest this assumption holds, the findings of other laboratory studies and the modeling study of Tuzet et al () suggest otherwise. In particular, laboratory findings of nonlinear relationships between stomatal uptake of water vapor and stomatal uptake of ozone (Eller & Sparks, ; Fares et al, ; Fares, Park, et al, ; Loreto & Fares, ; Tuzet et al, ) may imply nonnegligible resistance to ozone reaction inside the leaf.…”
Section: Theory Models and Observations Of Terrestrial Ozone Deposimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unconstrained variations in ozone dry deposition challenge the ability to attribute changes in tropospheric ozone to other processes (e.g., sources) accurately. Capturing unexpected variability with ozone flux records allows the community to build hypotheses about controlling processes, target laboratory and field measurements (Altimir et al, ; Fuentes & Gillespie, ; Fumagalli et al, ; Pleijel et al, ; Potier et al, ; S. Sun, Moravek, Trebs, et al, ; S. Sun, Moravek, von der Heyden, et al, ) and build mechanistic models (e.g., Potier et al, ).…”
Section: Measuring Ozone Dry Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Laboratory and field measurements that isolate nonstomatal pathways advance fundamental process‐level understanding (Cape et al, ; Fares et al, ; Fuentes & Gillespie, ; Fumagalli et al, ; Potier et al, ; von der Heyden, et al, ; Sun, Moravek, Trebs, et al, ) but are limited in constraining the relative importance of a specific deposition pathway at the ecosystem scale (i.e., what is measured through eddy covariance [EC] above the canopy). Interpreting ozone EC measurements relies on observation‐driven modeling for resistances to turbulence, molecular diffusion, and individual deposition pathways (Altimir et al, ; Clifton et al, ; Lamaud et al, ; Launiainen et al, ; Rannik et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The harmful properties of salts are less developed in clay soils than in sandy soils, since the water capacity of clay soils is greater than that of sandy soils, which is why the salt concentration is lower. Another impact factor is air humidity: with a decrease in the humidity level, the transpiration of plants reduces and, consequently, the plants' water supply reduces as well (Sun et al, 2016). Soil salinization can occur in different ways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%