1996
DOI: 10.3109/02841869609101639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twenty Years with Monoclonal Antibodies: State of the art-Where do we go?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been produced which bind to antigens present on a large number of tumor types. mAbs have been labeled with radiometals for diagnosis and therapy of cancer, and this has been a subject in many reviews published in the last 10 years. ,, Intact mAbs are large proteins with a MW of 160 kDa, and because of their large size, they have very slow biological clearance and are excreted through the hepatobiliary system. To circumvent these drawbacks, mAb fragments have been produced that have molecular weights ranging from 10 to 100 kDa.…”
Section: Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibodies For Tumor Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been produced which bind to antigens present on a large number of tumor types. mAbs have been labeled with radiometals for diagnosis and therapy of cancer, and this has been a subject in many reviews published in the last 10 years. ,, Intact mAbs are large proteins with a MW of 160 kDa, and because of their large size, they have very slow biological clearance and are excreted through the hepatobiliary system. To circumvent these drawbacks, mAb fragments have been produced that have molecular weights ranging from 10 to 100 kDa.…”
Section: Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibodies For Tumor Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] For radioimaging, an ideal reagent should clear rapidly so that the background is minimal, producing a high signal-to-noise ratio. [5][6][7] In contrast, radioimmunotherapy strives to achieve optimal tumor targeting as its primary objective to obtain therapeutic levels of the radionuclide in the tumor mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiolabeled mAbs have not proven to be the “magic bullets” that they were once hoped to be. Although many clinical studies have been conducted with radiolabeled mAbs, problems associated with low tumor concentrations, heterogeneous deposition in tumors, and unacceptably high bone marrow and normal organ toxicity, have kept radiolabeled mAbs from being an effective treatment for cancer ( ). A significant contributor to these problems is the long residence time of the radiolabeled antibody in blood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%