2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13317-020-0126-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twenty years of research on the DFS70/LEDGF autoantibody-autoantigen system: many lessons learned but still many questions

Abstract: The discovery and initial characterization 20 years ago of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANAs) presenting a dense fine speckled (DFS) nuclear pattern with strong staining of mitotic chromosomes, detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay in HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IIFA test), has transformed our view on ANAs. Traditionally, ANAs have been considered as reporters of abnormal immunological events associated with the onset and progression of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), also called ANA-associated rh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
3
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the percentage of monospecific anti-DFS70 patients was much higher in non-SARD (76.8%) than in SARD (15.2%) patients in HEp-2 IFA screening cohort. This to some extent supports that monospecific anti-DFS70 is a reliable biomarker to rule out diagnosis of SARD (35). Moreover, anti-Ro52/TRIM21 and anti-SSA/Ro60 were the most commonly detected autoantibodies accompanying anti-DFS70 antibodies in our LIA ENA profiles, while SLE-specific antibodies including Sm and dsDNA were not observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In our study, the percentage of monospecific anti-DFS70 patients was much higher in non-SARD (76.8%) than in SARD (15.2%) patients in HEp-2 IFA screening cohort. This to some extent supports that monospecific anti-DFS70 is a reliable biomarker to rule out diagnosis of SARD (35). Moreover, anti-Ro52/TRIM21 and anti-SSA/Ro60 were the most commonly detected autoantibodies accompanying anti-DFS70 antibodies in our LIA ENA profiles, while SLE-specific antibodies including Sm and dsDNA were not observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Subsequently, four new proteins have been also reported as HDGF-related proteins (HRPs), which include well-conserved N-terminal amino acid sequences (homologous to the amino terminus of HDGF; HATH region) [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. In addition, Lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF) [ 9 ], a survival factor for the lens epithelium, also includes a HATH region. HDGF and its related proteins include two putative nuclear localization signals (NLSs) ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Overview Of Hdgf: Its Characteristics and Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( B ) The homology of the HATH regions in the HDGF and its family proteins. High homology was observed [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. The red square indicates the basic amino acid-rich regions (KPNKRK or KPNKRR; basic residues underlined) as the presumed first nuclear localization signal (NLS1) in the HATH regions.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anti-DFS70 antibody targets DFS70 protein and appears as a DFS pattern in an ANA test [6]. The DFS70 protein upregulates the expression of anti-oxidant, stress response and cancer-associated genes in various cell types, and is regarded as a stress activated transcription co-activator [37]. However, the physiological function and importance of DFS70 protein in non-disease conditions remain largely unknown [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DFS70 protein upregulates the expression of anti-oxidant, stress response and cancer-associated genes in various cell types, and is regarded as a stress activated transcription co-activator [37]. However, the physiological function and importance of DFS70 protein in non-disease conditions remain largely unknown [37]. Despite being found in some inflammatory diseases, such as atopic diseases and eye diseases initially [3], the anti-DFS70 antibody also occurs commonly in sera from patients with non-SARD conditions, and even in healthy subjects (up to 21.6%) [3,4,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%