European Higher Education Area: The Impact of Past and Future Policies 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77407-7_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twenty Years of Bologna and a Decade of EHEA: What Is Next?

Abstract: Considering or raising critical questions about the future of the European Higher Education Area is hardly an original endeavor. In one sense, considerations of the future have been present since the outset. In the Bologna Declaration (Bologna Process 1999), 1 the Ministers of the then 29 "Bologna countries" referred to consolidating a European area of higher education by the end of the "first decade of the third millennium" by coordinating their policies to reach specified objectives and indicated their inten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is therefore a clear case for a Secretariat that works with a time horizon that is not limited to a single work program or Ministerial conference. To establish such a Secretariat, however, a good number of issues would need to be resolved, 72,73 including financial arrangements and guarantees for the Secretariat, the authority under which the Secretariat would work, arrangements for hiring and -in the worst of cases -firing staff, and arrangements for pensions and social security, and the seat and legal arrangements for the Secretariat. Even if these challenges have so far kept the BFUG from exploring a "permanent" Secretariat further, the BFUG will most likely need to explore this option in greater detail as the EHEA enters its third decade.…”
Section: Governance and Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is therefore a clear case for a Secretariat that works with a time horizon that is not limited to a single work program or Ministerial conference. To establish such a Secretariat, however, a good number of issues would need to be resolved, 72,73 including financial arrangements and guarantees for the Secretariat, the authority under which the Secretariat would work, arrangements for hiring and -in the worst of cases -firing staff, and arrangements for pensions and social security, and the seat and legal arrangements for the Secretariat. Even if these challenges have so far kept the BFUG from exploring a "permanent" Secretariat further, the BFUG will most likely need to explore this option in greater detail as the EHEA enters its third decade.…”
Section: Governance and Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the creative, innovative and expansive past decades, the 2010–2020 decade saw further extension, tensions and fatigue. Bergan (2015, p. 737) remarked that at the 2012 Bologna Ministerial Conference in Bucharest, more countries were represented at the senior official level than at the political level. One may wonder if, indeed, the interest is waning, not only for the process itself but also for the Bologna Policy Forum, in other words, the connection with the interest of the rest of the world.…”
Section: Historical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a feeling that the EHEA has achieved all it was intended to achieve, because the initial goals are now seen as too ambitious and nobody wants to be associated with failure, because the EHEA is seen too lose focus and become everything to all people, because an increasing focus on implementation implies that the EHEA is now seen as an administrative – some would say bureaucratic – rather than as a political challenge, or simply because “Bologna” ceases to be new it is also perceived to cease to be innovative and politically interesting (Bergan, 2015, p. 737).…”
Section: Historical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the precise objectives have evolved over time in connection with the work of the Bologna Follow-Up Group (BFUG) and, in particular, the Ministerial Conferences of members, the main goals of the process have concentrated on mobility between, and the compatibility of, higher education systems and the pursuit of quality in higher education (Bergan, 2019). In practical terms, the drive towards these objectives have included a focus on the structuring of systems in accordance with the three-cycle approach (Bachelor, Master’s, Doctorate); the creation of an EHEA Qualifications Framework and the development of common standards and processes for QA (Bergan and Deca, 2018; Brøgger, 2019). This drive resulted in the announcement of an education space of enhanced mobility and competitiveness, the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) in 2010.…”
Section: Quality Assurance In Higher Education In Europe: Bologna And...mentioning
confidence: 99%