1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-070x(98)00004-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twenty-one sources of error and bias in transport project appraisal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
101
0
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
101
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Our conjecture is that political decision making without the checks and balances of decision support tends to produce worse results. This is seen whenever projects acquire prior political commitment and become extremely difficult to stop however poor the economic case (Mackie and Preston, 1998).…”
Section: The Applicability Of Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our conjecture is that political decision making without the checks and balances of decision support tends to produce worse results. This is seen whenever projects acquire prior political commitment and become extremely difficult to stop however poor the economic case (Mackie and Preston, 1998).…”
Section: The Applicability Of Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actions by the agency are often required to alleviate perceived negative impacts of construction on the local societal environment as well as on the natural environment. The required accommodation is often unknown during the early stages of project development Board (2003), Daniels 1998, Mackie and Preston (1998), Schroeder (2000.…”
Section: Planning-externalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projects seem to often grow naturally as the project progresses from inception through development to construction Board (2003), Harbuck (2004), Mackie and Preston (1998).…”
Section: Planning-externalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations