2020
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.950.51298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twenty-one new species of the Simulium (Gomphostilbia) asakoae species group (Diptera, Simuliidae) in Thailand, with their genetic relationships

Abstract: Females and males reared from pupae, their pupal exuviae and cocoons, and mature larvae of the Simulium (Gomphostilbia) asakoae species group from various localities in Thailand were morphologically examined. A total of 25 species was identified, including two of four known species (Simulium asakoae Takaoka & Davies and S. chiangdaoense Takaoka & Srisuka), one newly confirmed species (S. myanmarense Takaoka, Srisuka & Saeung, originally described from Myanmar), one newly transferred spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clustering of closely related nominal species in these species groups corresponds with a low level of minimum interspecific genetic distance between them, impeding the efficacy of the COI gene for identification. Previous studies revealed no or very low levels of minimum interspecific genetic divergence in some putative species of black flies, particularly closely related species [ 24 , 28 , 29 , 31 , 71 ] and members of species complexes [ 21 , 72 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The clustering of closely related nominal species in these species groups corresponds with a low level of minimum interspecific genetic distance between them, impeding the efficacy of the COI gene for identification. Previous studies revealed no or very low levels of minimum interspecific genetic divergence in some putative species of black flies, particularly closely related species [ 24 , 28 , 29 , 31 , 71 ] and members of species complexes [ 21 , 72 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, these pairs can be morphologically distinguished from their sister species based on the number of male upper-eye facets and differences in pupae [ 3 , 6 , 7 ]. In the S. asakoae species group in Thailand where there is considerable morphological variation but few COI gene changes, the inference is that some members of the group might have recently diverged from a common ancestor, rendering the use of the COI gene insufficient to discriminate the species [ 31 ]. Previous studies have demonstrated limited differentiation among some members of the S. asakoae species group when using only the COI gene [ 29 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…nov. and the S. angulistylum cytoform B (0.69%) that overlapped with intraspecific genetic divergence. No or very low interspecific genetic divergence is not uncommon for tropical black fly species, particularly for members of the subgenus Gomphostilbia (Pramual et al, 2011(Pramual et al, , 2021Pramual & Adler, 2014;Takaoka et al, 2020;Srisuka et al, 2021). Recent DNA barcoding analysis found that 12 species of black flies in Thailand have no genetic differentiation based on their COI sequence (Pramual et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the S. epistum species-group, no genetic differentiation was found between S. whartoni and S. cheongi based on COI sequences. Low genetic variation between closely related species could be due to misidentification, incomplete lineage sorting or inadequate phylogenetic signal for the COI sequences because they had possibly diverged from a common ancestor only recently (Takaoka et al, 2020). Thus, more variable molecular markers are needed, such as big zinc finger (BZF) and the elongation complex protein 1 gene (ECP1) that have been successfully used for differentiation of the closely related black fly species in Thailand (Thaijarern et al, 2017;Aupalee et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%