2017
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.275107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twenty-Four-Hour Biological Variation Profiles of Cardiac Troponin I in Individuals with or without Chronic Kidney Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
29
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
29
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This enhances the need for relevant and robust estimates of BV also in a long-term setting in healthy individuals to aid in the interpretation of changes in cTn, as well as establishing reference change value (RCV) and analytical performance specifications (APS) for the use of cTn in such a manner [11]. Currently available BV data for cTnI BV have been summarized by Nordenskjöld et al [12] and are mostly based on [1] analysis with a non-commercial analytical system [13], [2] small cohorts of potentially unhealthy individuals [12,14,15] or [3] based on sampling with a short time interval (24 h) [16]. The scope of our study was to estimate the weekly BV of high-sensitive cTnI with two recently released commercial methods targeting different epitopes, Siemens Atellica and Singulex Clarity (Singulex is as of June 2019 no longer on the market), on the well-characterized population of the European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS) [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enhances the need for relevant and robust estimates of BV also in a long-term setting in healthy individuals to aid in the interpretation of changes in cTn, as well as establishing reference change value (RCV) and analytical performance specifications (APS) for the use of cTn in such a manner [11]. Currently available BV data for cTnI BV have been summarized by Nordenskjöld et al [12] and are mostly based on [1] analysis with a non-commercial analytical system [13], [2] small cohorts of potentially unhealthy individuals [12,14,15] or [3] based on sampling with a short time interval (24 h) [16]. The scope of our study was to estimate the weekly BV of high-sensitive cTnI with two recently released commercial methods targeting different epitopes, Siemens Atellica and Singulex Clarity (Singulex is as of June 2019 no longer on the market), on the well-characterized population of the European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS) [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results show that observed changes in consecutively measured BNP and NT-proBNP samples must be relatively large to meet the threshold for a ‘true’ change, while smaller changes between serial measurements of hs-TnT and ST2 are indicative of a significant change. Studies examining biological variation have been performed in healthy populations, but a growing interest in variation components of biomarkers in populations with (cardiovascular) disease resulted in newer studies addressing biological variation in heart failure and chronic kidney disease 15 17–20 38. We found that indices of biological variation in stable AVS approximated indices found in studies investigating biological variation in healthy subjects and chronic and stable heart failure 17 20 38…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Studies investigating biological variation of cardiac biomarkers have been performed in healthy subjects, but data obtained from specific patient populations are rare,15–20 limiting the generalisability of the findings from healthy subjects to patients. Biological variation of biomarkers in patients with AVS has never been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is yet thought that cTnT as well as cTnI are cleared by the kidney, but in patients with renal failure, cTnT is increased more frequently than cTnI [35]. It might therefore be possible that a diurnal change in cTnT clearance could contribute to the circadian variability described [7,8,36] previously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%