Twenty-five years on: revisiting Bosnia and Herzegovina after implementation of a family medicine development program

Abstract

Background: The wars that ravaged the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in the 1990's resulted in the near destruction of the healthcare system, including education of medical students and the training of specialist physicians. In the latter stages of the war, inspired by Family Medicine programs in countries such as Canada, plans to rebuild a new system founded on a strong primary care model emerged. Over the next fifteen years, the Queen's University Family Medicine Development Program in Bosnia and Herzegovina played an instrumental role in rebuilding the primary care system through educational initiatives at the undergraduate, residency, Masters, PhD, and continuing professional development levels. Changes were supported by new laws and regulations to insure sustainability. This study revisited Bosnia and Herzegovina (B-H) 8-years after the end of the program to explore the impact of initiatives through understanding the perspectives and experiences of individuals at all levels of the primary care system from students, deans of medical schools, Family Medicine residents, practicing physicians, Health Center Directors and Association Leaders. Methods: Qualitative exploratory design using purposeful sampling. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with key informants were conducted in English or with an interpreter as needed and audiotaped. Transcripts and field notes were analyzed using an interpretative phenomenological approach to identify major themes and subthemes. Results: Overall, 118 participants were interviewed. Three major themes and 9 subthemes were identified including (1)

Reshaping ophthalmology training after COVID-19 pandemic

“…Thus, a prolonged delay in practical and didactic training might not be recovered and result in the failure to acquire the necessary surgical and clinical skills for both residents and fellows without an extension of training. In this regard, the COVID-19 pandemic, whose duration and magnitude are still unknown, might be compared with other catastrophic events, such as wars or natural disasters, having a dramatic impact on the economy, society, health systems and, therefore, medical education [10,11]. As has happened in countries ravaged by wars, the crisis within GME should be mitigated and facilitators should take this opportunity to introduce structural and targeted changes, sustainable over time, leading to an improvement and a greater flexibility in the preexisting system [10,12].…”

Health Sovereignty: A Historical and Political Analysis of Primary Healthcare Development and Idea Transfer in Iran and the Global Context

“…As a result, PHC was further limited to PC in Iran and the Alma-Ata declaration's vision of PHC as being linked with social and environmental determinants of health did not materialize. According to Hodgetts et al (2019), this has occurred in the majority of other nations. Maybe this is why the WHO suggested a fresh effort to go back to Alma-Ata [56] and Rasanathan (2020) emphasizes on implementation solutions to contribute to the much bigger political vision of primary health care [62].…”

Undergraduate Medical Education Reform in Viet Nam for a Primary Health Care Workforce

“…This can translate to a ‘hidden curriculum’ that privileges training in AMCs over primary care or community-based sites and diminishes the value of primary care in the eyes of faculty and students [ 12 13 ]. Finally, in multiple countries, PHC is not considered a valued separate entity but rather a default pathway for those who do not pursue training in specialty care [ 14 15 ].…”