2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1404-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twenty-five-Year Follow-up of Short-term Cancer Research Trainees at the University of Alabama at Birmingham: a Brief Report

Abstract: Long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the impact of short-term cancer research programs on the career trajectories of medical and graduate students. Participation in these programs may be crucial in fostering the next generation of cancer research scientists. This report presents the career outcomes and research productivity of 77 medical and public health students with 25 years of tracking data following their participation in a summer cancer research training program at the University of Alabama at Birmi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Publication after summer research programs has been used as an outcome measure for program value [ 14 ]. The 54% publication rate after SCORE for our students, primarily undergraduates, is within the 23–68% range reported after summer programs for more advanced medical or graduate students [ 15 , 16 ]. 2/3 of students’ publications after SCORE were authored with a new mentor, similar to prior results from a summer medical student program [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Publication after summer research programs has been used as an outcome measure for program value [ 14 ]. The 54% publication rate after SCORE for our students, primarily undergraduates, is within the 23–68% range reported after summer programs for more advanced medical or graduate students [ 15 , 16 ]. 2/3 of students’ publications after SCORE were authored with a new mentor, similar to prior results from a summer medical student program [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%