2009
DOI: 10.2215/cjn.04940908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twelve-Month Pancreas Graft Function Significantly Influences Survival Following Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

8
55
0
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
55
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…A pancreas graft loss is inversely associated with long-term survival. As shown by Weiss et al [13], Morath et al [14] and Salvalaggio et al [36], success of dual transplantation (SPK) depends on a long-term functioning pancreas graft. This is consistent with our findings of lower mortality in SPK recipients with a functioning pancreas graft 1 year post transplant compared with those recipients with a failing pancreas graft 1 year post transplant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A pancreas graft loss is inversely associated with long-term survival. As shown by Weiss et al [13], Morath et al [14] and Salvalaggio et al [36], success of dual transplantation (SPK) depends on a long-term functioning pancreas graft. This is consistent with our findings of lower mortality in SPK recipients with a functioning pancreas graft 1 year post transplant compared with those recipients with a failing pancreas graft 1 year post transplant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obvious benefit of a functioning pancreas graft is normalised blood glucose control without the use of insulin, compared with consistent moderate hyperglycaemia controlled with insulin use. The question whether cardiovascular outcomes can be improved by transplanting a pancreas simultaneously with the kidney remains, however, controversial [11][12][13][14]. A major obstacle when comparing outcomes following SPK vs kidney transplantation alone (KTA; from either a deceased or a living donor) in recipients with type 1 diabetes has been imbalance in risk factors between patient populations, particularly due to selection of younger patients with less comorbidity for SPK transplantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This controversy is highlighted by three recent publications authored by Young et al (1), Weiss et al (2), and our group (3). Analyzing data from large registries, all three studies compared kidney graft and patient survival in SPK (all from deceased organ donors) and KTA transplants, whereby the KTA grafts were from deceased (DDK) or living donors (LDK).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survival benefit of SPK over DDKA has been consistently reported for T1DM recipients, with difference in survival noted as early as 12 months after transplantation (13). This benefit appears to be related to both kidney donor quality and a functional pancreas transplant for the first era (approximately 5 years) after transplantation (2,14). However, in a large retrospective analysis of T1DM recipients, after 5 years SPK was associated with a reduction in mortality risk, and after 10 years, with a reduction in risk for kidney graft loss, suggesting that over time the benefits of SPK become more evident (3,15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…With 1-year patient and pancreas graft survival rates of 96% and 85%, respectively (1) and evidence of long-term advantages of functional pancreas transplantation upon survival compared with living-donor and deceased-donor kidney transplantation alone (2,3), an argument can be made that SPK is the transplantation option of choice for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%