2018
DOI: 10.1044/2017_jslhr-s-17-0095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tutorial and Guidelines on Measurement of Sound Pressure Level in Voice and Speech

Abstract: SPL of voice and speech should be reported together with the mouth-to-microphone distance so that the levels can be related to vocal power. Sound level measurement settings (i.e., frequency weighting and time weighting/averaging) should always be specified. Classified sound level meters should be used to assure measurement accuracy. Head-mounted microphones placed at the proximity of the mouth improve signal-to-noise ratio and can be taken advantage of for voice SPL measurements when calibrated. Background noi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the model relies on simplifying assumptions, the experimental and theoretical values follow the same trend and match reasonably well. The final SPL difference between the subglottal and radiated sound depends mainly on the dominant components of the sound spectrum which are around the lowest harmonic frequencies 50 . In our case these were around 50-200 Hz (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the model relies on simplifying assumptions, the experimental and theoretical values follow the same trend and match reasonably well. The final SPL difference between the subglottal and radiated sound depends mainly on the dominant components of the sound spectrum which are around the lowest harmonic frequencies 50 . In our case these were around 50-200 Hz (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microphoneto-mouth distance was measured for each participant. A 1000-Hz calibration tone was recorded after each data collection using the participant's microphone-to-mouth distance as the distance from the sound source to the microphone and SPL meter (Švec & Granqvist, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microphone was placed at a fixed distance of 10 cm from the animal's mouth. SPL levels were calibrated with C frequency weighting for a distance of 30 cm using an SPL meter (ATL SL-8851, ATP Instrumentation Ltd, Ashby-dela-Zouch, UK), applying method 5 from Svec and Granqvist (2017). Background noise levels were measured at 55.3 dB(C).…”
Section: Materials and Methods Data Acquisition In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%