2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91436-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tusnády’s Problem, the Transference Principle, and Non-uniform QMC Sampling

Abstract: It is well-known that for every N ≥ 1 and d ≥ 1 there exist point sets x1, . . . , xN ∈ [0, 1] d whose discrepancy with respect to the Lebesgue measure is of order at most (log N ) d−1 N −1 . In a more general setting, the first author proved together with Josef Dick that for any normalized measure µ on [0, 1] d there exist points x1, . . . , xN whose discrepancy with respect to µ is of order at most (log N ) (3d+1)/2 N −1 . The proof used methods from combinatorial mathematics, and in particular a result of B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ì ÓÖ Ñ 1.3 (Aistleitner, Bilyk, Nikolov, [1])º For every d ≥ 1, there exists a constant c d (depending only on d) such that the following holds. For every N ≥ 2 and every normalized Borel measure μ on [0, 1] d there exist points…”
Section: Star-discrepancymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Ì ÓÖ Ñ 1.3 (Aistleitner, Bilyk, Nikolov, [1])º For every d ≥ 1, there exists a constant c d (depending only on d) such that the following holds. For every N ≥ 2 and every normalized Borel measure μ on [0, 1] d there exist points…”
Section: Star-discrepancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence this case can be treated by generalizing the arguments given in [9,10]. 1 Ê Ñ Ö 1.4º Recall that in dimension d = 1, Lebesgue's decomposition theorem states any Borel measure μ can be written as…”
Section: Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Integration with respect to measures other than the Lebesgue measure arises often, and a constructive proof of our upper bound could have significant impact in practice. We refer to the note [1] for an exposition of these connections.…”
Section: Lemma 4 and Theorem 2 Imply Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%