2010
DOI: 10.1890/10-0260.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turning up the heat: Temperature influences the relative importance of top‐down and bottom‐up effects

Abstract: Abstract. Understanding how communities respond to changes in temperature is a major challenge for community ecology. Temperature influences the relative degree to which topdown and bottom-up forces structure ecological communities. In greenhouse experiments using the aquatic community found in pitcher plants (Sarracenia purpurea), I tested how temperature affected the relative importance of top-down (mosquito predation) and bottomup (ant carcasses) forces on protozoa and bacteria populations. While bottom-up … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
88
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(36 reference statements)
11
88
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From field experiments performed in Michigan (non-naive, native range, with a similar temperature range as our experiment), Hoekman (2007Hoekman ( , 2010 found that, although protozoan biovolume greatly decreased in the presence of the mosquito top predator, bacterial density was unaffected. Further, Hoekman (2007) found that the species richness of non-naive prey communities was affected, but only when 20 mosquito larvae were added to the system, which corresponds to high mosquito density in a natural setting (Nastase et al 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From field experiments performed in Michigan (non-naive, native range, with a similar temperature range as our experiment), Hoekman (2007Hoekman ( , 2010 found that, although protozoan biovolume greatly decreased in the presence of the mosquito top predator, bacterial density was unaffected. Further, Hoekman (2007) found that the species richness of non-naive prey communities was affected, but only when 20 mosquito larvae were added to the system, which corresponds to high mosquito density in a natural setting (Nastase et al 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…When dealing with colonies of protists, the size of a single cell was measured and the species were grouped into one of the three size classes accordingly. Note that we concentrated on species composition because it is already known that W. smithii has a strong effect on the abundance of protists (Addicott 1974;Hoekman 2007Hoekman , 2010Gray et al 2014). Our choice was further motivated by the current interest in the impact of invaders on the diversity and species composition of resident communities (e.g., Hector et al 2002;Fargione and Tilman 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in grassland systems Barton and Schmitz (2009) demonstrated that top-down predator effects interact with warming to decrease grasshopper abundance. Additionally, a study on the relative effects of mosquito larvae in a pitcher plant community shows a similar positive relationship between temperature and top-down processes (Hoekman 2010). While this was not quantified in our study, it is possible that warming led to an increase in the top-down predator effects on insect herbivores resulting in lower rates of herbivory in the warmest chambers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Our results confirm the well-documented sensitivity of top predators to landscape alteration (Purvis et al 2000;Martinson and Fagan 2014) but suggest that for grassland insect communities, the decline of top predators does not necessarily lead to predator-mediated effects on herbivore communities. However, recent studies have shown that the regulatory effect of top predators on insects can be context dependent as a function of seasonality (Gratton and Denno 2003), wind speed (Barton 2014), and especially temperature (Hoekman 2010;Shurin et al 2012;Barton and Ives 2014). In the current context of global change, caution is therefore required when predicting the relative importance of predatormediated processes versus plant-mediated processes, as it is likely to change as a function of the focal stressors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%