2009
DOI: 10.1108/02635570911002270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turning knowledge into new product creativity: an empirical study

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between knowledge acquisition, dissemination, and innovation and new product creativity and to identify different hidden patterns in which knowledge acquisition, dissemination, and innovation affect new product creativity. Design/methodology/approach -The paper employs additivity and variance stabilization analysis. Findings -The new product creativity is significantly related to knowledge management. Practical implications -The paper implie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And even conflict in groups, if adequately managed, can be beneficial for creativity as it can help to generate innovative solutions to ill-structured problems (Troyer and Youngreen, 2009). These ideas are consistent with Yang and Rui (2009) findings about how both knowledge dissemination in organizations, and knowledge innovation contribute to the enhancement of creativity continuously.…”
Section: Individual Creativity Performancesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…And even conflict in groups, if adequately managed, can be beneficial for creativity as it can help to generate innovative solutions to ill-structured problems (Troyer and Youngreen, 2009). These ideas are consistent with Yang and Rui (2009) findings about how both knowledge dissemination in organizations, and knowledge innovation contribute to the enhancement of creativity continuously.…”
Section: Individual Creativity Performancesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, we could not conclude how reliable/sensitive AVAS is in comparison with ACE. Yang (2009) and Yang and Rui (2009) use the AVAS algorithm to analyze supply chain alliance performance and new product creativity, respectively. Although they mention ACE in their studies, they do not compare the AVAS results with the ACE results.…”
Section: B1 the Difference Between Ace And Avasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge sharing is 1060 IJOPM 35,7 critical to product innovation and performance in NPD (Yang and Rui, 2009;Yang, 2001;Court, 1997) because firms must be able to efficiently transfer, integrate and further develop knowledge and products. The general perspective indicates that sharing more knowledge usually improves product and service performances (Clemons and Hitt, 2000).…”
Section: Knowledge Sharing and Product Performancementioning
confidence: 99%