2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turning behavior in healthy older adults: Is there a preference for step versus spin turns?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with our findings, spin-turns were more frequent among older persons compared to step turns [33]. Besides that, a decrease in step frequency during ST compared to the step frequency in CT was also reported in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Consistent with our findings, spin-turns were more frequent among older persons compared to step turns [33]. Besides that, a decrease in step frequency during ST compared to the step frequency in CT was also reported in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This suggests simplifying the task may be a strategy to cope with the loss of intersegmental co-ordination in people with PD. The tighter control of the ''enbloc'' pattern of turning has also been replicated in healthy elderly when turning with their eyes closed [46] and whilst challenging the vestibular, visual and proprioceptive systems by eyes closed and on a moving platform [29], all of which suggests a purposeful adaptation to simplify the control of movement, by reducing the degrees of freedom in the axial segments when turning under more challenging conditions. However, recent studies have also found an ''enbloc'' turning strategy in healthy older adults when the turn is simple, such as to a predictable direction, selfpaced and on-the-spot [8,32], suggesting an ability to also reduce the degrees of freedom in turning movement when the task is simple; a flexible adaption that may not be possible for people with PD; therefore, making all turning environments challenging.…”
Section: Turning In Pd 1385mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Numerous studies have highlighted the importance of accounting for turning, as well as the physiological and the biomechanical effects of turning when compared to straight-line locomotion in adults (Akram et al 2010; Buchheit et al 2012; Dellal et al 2010; Hatamoto et al 2013, 2014; Huxham et al 2006; Justine et al 2014; Orendurff et al 2006; Patla et al 1999; Wilson et al 2013). A recent study found that when shuttle run distance was reduced from 7.0 to 3.5 m and completed at the same average running speed, the 3.5 m shuttles induced a greater physiological response (Bekraoui et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although findings from Dixon et al (2013) is limited to laboratory settings, evidence suggests that children tend to adopt spin turns, with this adoption likely to be dependent on increasing gait velocity. Research suggests that spin turns limit the size of the moving base of support (Akram et al 2010), which consequently leads to reduced stability, increasing the physiological strain on both lower limb (Hader et al 2016) and upper body muscles (Buchheit et al 2010). Therefore, it could be postulated that the increasing demands of a turn, such as a 180° at a speed of 5.5 km h −1 , may expose children’s gait immaturity and concurrently lead to the adoption of the more complex turning sub-strategies identified within adult populations (Dixon et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%