Turn off the graphics: designing non-visual interfaces for mobile phone games

Valente, Luis; Souza, Clarisse Sieckenius de; Feijó, Bruno

doi:10.1007/bf03192576

Cited by 16 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another example is the work of Valente et al [17] who investigated mobile accessible games for the visually impaired. Phone tilt controlled player movement while navigating a maze.…”

Section: Tilt As An Input Primitivementioning

confidence: 99%

FittsTilt

MacKenzie

Teather

2012

Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We evaluated tilt as an input method for devices with built-in accelerometers, such as touchscreen phones and tablet computers. The evaluation was empirical and experimental. Sixteen participants performed a tilt-based position-select task, similar to the multi-directional Fitts' law task in ISO 9241-9. Four levels of tilt gain (25, 50, 100, and 200) and two selection modes (first-entry and 500 ms dwell) were used. Movement times were lowest with tilt gain = 50 and first-entry selection. Maximum tilt angles ranged from about 2° to 13°, depending on condition. Tilt as an input primitive is shown to conform to Fitts' law. Throughput is low, however, about 2.3 bits/s for first-entry and 1.2 bits/s for dwell.

show abstract

“…Another example is the work of Valente et al [17] who investigated mobile accessible games for the visually impaired. Phone tilt controlled player movement while navigating a maze.…”

Section: Tilt As An Input Primitivementioning

confidence: 99%

FittsTilt

MacKenzie

Teather

2012

Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For instance, mobile phone tilt and the traditional button input were evaluated in a driving game Gilbertson et al (2008); user experiences such as fun were focused in the testing (informal). For example, Browne and Anand (2011) examined tilt, gesture and buttons in a shooting game, and reported a similar result as tilt interaction is preferred (Valente et al 2009). Participants preferred tilt-based interactions since they are more natural.…”

Section: Swipe Tap and Tilt In Mobile Gamesmentioning

confidence: 91%

Design, User Experience, and Usability: Technological Contexts

Marcus¹

2016

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Much of the work on tilt control for games is qualitative, for example, looking at user experience [5,26]. However, there is also quantitative work [2,18].…”

Section: Gamesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Position vs. Velocity Control for Tilt-Based Interaction

Teather

MacKenzie

2020

Graphics Interface 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research investigating factors in the design of tilt-based interfaces is presented. An experiment with 16 participants used a tablet and a 2D pointing task to compare position-control and velocitycontrol using device tilt to manipulate an on-screen cursor. Four selection modes were also evaluated, ranging from instantaneous selection upon hitting a target to a 500-ms time delay prior to selection. Results indicate that position-control was approximately 2× faster than velocity-control, regardless of selection delay. Position-control had higher pointing throughput (3.3 bps vs. 1.2 bps for velocity-control), more precise cursor motion, and was universally preferred by participants.

show abstract

Turn off the graphics: designing non-visual interfaces for mobile phone games

Cited by 16 publications

References 24 publications

FittsTilt

FittsTilt

Design, User Experience, and Usability: Technological Contexts

Position vs. Velocity Control for Tilt-Based Interaction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About