2017
DOI: 10.21547/jss.281253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Türkiye’nin Almanya, Rusya Ve Çin İle Ticari İlişkileri: Girdi-Çıktı Analizi İle Bir Uygulama

Abstract: ÖzetAlmanya, Rusya ve Çin özellikle ticari ilişkiler bakımından Türkiye için özel bir öneme sahiptir. Türkiye'nin ithalatı açısından bu ülkeler ilk üç sırayı almaktadır. Bu sebeple çalışmada adı geçen ülkeler ile Türkiye arasındaki dış ticaret ilişkisi ve kilit endüstriler 1995, 2000, 2005, 2008 ve 2011 yıllarına ait veriler kullanılarak girdi-çıktı analizi yardımıyla belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar ışığında; Türkiye için ithalata bağımlı üretim modeli koşullarının gerçekleştiği, diğer ülkele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we identified key sectors in the economy by calculating forward and backward linkage indices for these sub-periods. According to our findings, the industries producing intermediate goods have been the key sector of the Turkish economy in all sub-periods, indicating a high priority for investment (Altan et al 2015;Ersungur et al 2011;Pehlivanoğlu and İnce 2020). Given the high energy import dependency of the manufacturing sector, investments in intermediate goods can also reduce the import component of exports, decrease current account pressures, and increase the import-substitution component of output growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, we identified key sectors in the economy by calculating forward and backward linkage indices for these sub-periods. According to our findings, the industries producing intermediate goods have been the key sector of the Turkish economy in all sub-periods, indicating a high priority for investment (Altan et al 2015;Ersungur et al 2011;Pehlivanoğlu and İnce 2020). Given the high energy import dependency of the manufacturing sector, investments in intermediate goods can also reduce the import component of exports, decrease current account pressures, and increase the import-substitution component of output growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Celasun's (1983) comprehensive analysis of growth sources during the inward-looking development era from the 1950s to the late 1970s was followed by numerous studies (Caliskan and Aydogus 2011;Guncavdi and Kucukcifci 2004;Voyvoda 2008) that highlighted the role of domestic final demand and export expansion in driving output growth, while import substitution had a negative impact. Altan et al (2015), Ersungur et al (2011), and Pehlivanoğlu and İnce (2020) extended these findings, identifying the manufacturing and utilities sectors as critical for different sub-periods. Our analysis builds on these earlier studies, using I-O tables for 1973, 1979, 1990, 2002, and 2012 from the TURKSTAT database and for 2021 prepared by Tasci (2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%