“…Simultaneously, however, as one scholar puts it, Turkey appears to be cleaving to a 'new multi-dimensional political strategy' aimed at staving off regional conflict and establishing 'relations of interdependency by using political, social and economic challenges, especially through private enterprises and the oil and natural gas pipeline network'. 51 Echoing similar points, Kemal Kirişci argues that a process of 'desecuritisation' has been afoot as Turkey recalibrates its foreign policies towards its neighbourhood; one that puts a high premium on the 'movement of people, civil society and economic interactions' for the ultimate purpose of instantiating a 'democratic peace' in the Middle East. 52 Following these premises, the assertion, therefore, is that if all the above-mentioned factors could be construed as clear signs of the Turkish quest for an independent foreign policy towards the Middle East-also known as 'Zero Problems, Phase II', aimed at 'minimising conflicts and seeking accommodation wherever possible with neighbors' 53 -it is no small wonder that Ankara-Tehran relations under the AKP government flourished in various areas, even in the heat of international sanctions and despite the diverging positions between the two countries on the Syrian dilemma.…”