2013 28th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science 2013
DOI: 10.1109/lics.2013.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turing Machines with Atoms

Abstract: We study Turing machines over sets with atoms, also known as nominal sets. Our main result is that deterministic machines are weaker than nondeterministic ones; in particular, P =NP in sets with atoms. Our main construction is closely related to the Cai-Fürer-Immerman graphs used in descriptive complexity theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to (strict) models (see (8)), in a lax model the converse does not hold: not all the transitions are derivable from the GSOS rules.…”
Section: S Xmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In contrast to (strict) models (see (8)), in a lax model the converse does not hold: not all the transitions are derivable from the GSOS rules.…”
Section: S Xmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Net models similar to Petri nets with data have been continuously proposed since the 80s, including, among the others, high-level Petri nets [13], colored Petri nets [17], unordered and ordered data nets [21], ν-Petri nets [25], and constraint multiset rewriting [5,8,9]. Petri nets with data can be also considered as a reinterpretation of the classical definition of Petri nets in sets with atoms [3,4], where one allows for orbit-finite sets of places and transitions instead of just finite ones. The decidability and complexity of standard problems for Petri nets over various data domains has attracted a lot of attention recently, see for instance [14,21,22,24,25].…”
Section: Relatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose to define our sets by first order formulas, but all results we show here could be reformulated in terms of group actions, orbit-finite sets and finite supports, studied in [21]. In fact, we used that terminology in most previous work on computation theory over sets with atoms [10], [23], [24], of which the present paper is a natural continuation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various extensions of first order logic can be also evaluated over linearly p-patched structures, in particular the Least Fix Point logic (LFP), a well studied extension of first order logic by a fixpoint operation [8], [35]. It turns out that over linearly p-patched structures, LFP is equivalent to LFP+C (a further extension by a counting mechanism) and to polynomial time Turing Machines with Atoms -an analogue of Turing machines in the realms of sets with atoms [10], [24].…”
Section: Order-invariant Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%