Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Nin 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2603088.2603135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turing machines with atoms, constraint satisfaction problems, and descriptive complexity

Abstract: We study deterministic computability over sets with atoms. We characterize those alphabets for which Turing machines with atoms determinize. To this end, the determinization problem is expressed as a Constraint Satisfaction Problem, and a characterization is obtained from deep results in CSP theory. As an application to Descriptive Complexity Theory, within a substantial class of relational structures including Cai-Fürer-Immerman graphs, we precisely characterize those subclasses where the logic IFP+C captures… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in Section V we show how locally finite templates streamline the (previously unpleasantly technical) proof of the main result in [10], a characterization of those linearly patched structures over which the least fixpoint logic LFP captures polynomial time computations.…”
Section: + 21 =mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, in Section V we show how locally finite templates streamline the (previously unpleasantly technical) proof of the main result in [10], a characterization of those linearly patched structures over which the least fixpoint logic LFP captures polynomial time computations.…”
Section: + 21 =mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We choose to define our sets by first order formulas, but all results we show here could be reformulated in terms of group actions, orbit-finite sets and finite supports, studied in [21]. In fact, we used that terminology in most previous work on computation theory over sets with atoms [10], [23], [24], of which the present paper is a natural continuation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations