2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulent transport of particles in a straight square duct

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data point corresponding to the smallest value of particle inertia (τ + p = 1) is slightly below the data envelope, suggesting that deposition is less likely in a square duct for low-inertia particles than in a circular duct. This is consistent with a previous observation that low-inertia particles are more likely than high-inertia particles to be carried back into the core of the square duct by the mean secondary swirling flow (Sharma and Phares 2006). By contrast, higher inertia particles are efficiently carried to the walls where they are more likely to deposit or accumulate near the wall in regions of high strain rate.…”
Section: Deposition Ratesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The data point corresponding to the smallest value of particle inertia (τ + p = 1) is slightly below the data envelope, suggesting that deposition is less likely in a square duct for low-inertia particles than in a circular duct. This is consistent with a previous observation that low-inertia particles are more likely than high-inertia particles to be carried back into the core of the square duct by the mean secondary swirling flow (Sharma and Phares 2006). By contrast, higher inertia particles are efficiently carried to the walls where they are more likely to deposit or accumulate near the wall in regions of high strain rate.…”
Section: Deposition Ratesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This suggests a preferential enhancement of deposition of higher-inertia particles by the secondary flows unique to the square duct, or a suppression of deposition of the lower-inertia particles by the secondary flows, or perhaps both. Deposition suppression of particles having τ + p ≤ 15 is not immediately obvious from Figure 3, but is consistent with the observation by Sharma and Phares (2006) that lower-inertia particles are increasingly more likely to be carried back to the center of the duct by the mean swirling flows. Sharma and Phares (2006) noted that centrifuging by the mean swirl is not a valid explanation for this phenomenon, since the Stokes number based on the mean off-axis velocity and the size of the mean circulation is much smaller than unity for all values FIG.…”
Section: Deposition Patternssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…% 300 Gavrilakis (1992), Joung et al (2007), Pinelli et al (2010) and Xu (2009) Madabhushi and Vanka (1991) and Xu and Pollard (2001) Heat transfer by Piller and Nobile (2002) and Ma et al (2007) Heat transfer by Pallares and Davidson (2002) and Vázquez and Métais (2002) Rotating duct by Yang et al (2010) Rotating duct by Pallares and Davidson (2000) With particles by Sharma and Phares (2006) and Zhang et al (2011Zhang et al ( , 2014Zhang et al ( , 2015 With particles by Winkler et al (2004) and Winkler and Rani (2009) …”
Section: Dns Les Ransmentioning
confidence: 99%