2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10652-018-9629-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulent structures of buoyant jet in cross-flow studied through large-eddy simulation

Abstract: In the present paper we study buoyant (plume) and non-buoyant (jet) fluid injection in a neutrally stratified uniform cross-flow. Both cases are of practical importance in environmental fluid mechanics. The study is carried out numerically, using highly resolved large-eddy simulation in conjunction with the Lagrangian dynamic sub-grid scale model for both momentum and scalar transport equations. The velocity ratio is κ = 8. In the plume case, the Froude number is F = 10, such to allow the use of the Boussinesq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption has been proven to be effective in the simulation of natural convection processes [55,56].…”
Section: Large-eddy Simulation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This assumption has been proven to be effective in the simulation of natural convection processes [55,56].…”
Section: Large-eddy Simulation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the value of ν SGS is compared with the molecular kinematic viscosity ν, by scrutinising the ratio γ = ν/(ν + ν SGS ). Such parameter measures the contribution of the sub-grid scale with respect to the computational mesh used: γ ∼ 1 indicates that the LES reduces to a quasi DNS, γ ∼ 0 means a high contribution of turbulent model and thus a coarse spatial resolution, while γ > 1/3 corresponds to ν/ν SGS = 2 and suggests a good mesh resolution [55,64]. In the region above the slope where the largest part of the anabatic flow is localised, γ > 0.75 indicating that the correction due to the turbulent model is limited and that the turbulent kinetic energy is dissipated mainly by the resolved scale of motion than the sub-grid scales.…”
Section: Computational Grid Initial and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pimpleFoam basic code was customized to also solve pollutant concentration equations, while the dynamic Lagrangian model was implemented ex novo. Such a turbulent model has been previously tested and validated (Cintolesi et al 2019).…”
Section: Numerical Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cintolesi et al [26] performed LES simulations of buoyant jets in a neutral crossflow. Their simulations reproduced the counter-rotating vortex pair in the entrainment region where crossflow dominates over the initial momentum and buoyancy.…”
Section: Plume Bifurcationmentioning
confidence: 99%