1968
DOI: 10.2514/3.5002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulent boundary-layer growth and separation on a yawed cone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both cones, the effects of flow separation become appreciable when /3 > 1.1 in good agreement with experimental data. 2 -3 ' 15 At lower values of f3 an irregular vortex sheet develops remaining very close to the body surface and resembling a vortex bubble more than a vortex sheet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For both cones, the effects of flow separation become appreciable when /3 > 1.1 in good agreement with experimental data. 2 -3 ' 15 At lower values of f3 an irregular vortex sheet develops remaining very close to the body surface and resembling a vortex bubble more than a vortex sheet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the results of Rainbird's recent tests on a 12.5° cone under turbulent boundary-layer separation have indicated that the separation angle is a function of relative incidence, and that the flow features were "qualitatively similar" to laminar boundary-layer separation at low speeds. 15 The differences between the results of Refs. 16 and 17 may be in part explained by the use of different criteria assumed in the definition of the separation angle.…”
Section: Separation Pointsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Numerical resolution and turbulence modeling both become important. To illustrate the effect of the choice of turbulence model, the data from the bench mark flow published by Rainbird (1968) at a given axial location are compared with several computations in figure 31. The surface shear-stress angle direc t ions ws are defined relative to the conical generator.…”
Section: Cross-flow Separation At Supersonic Speedsmentioning
confidence: 99%