2004
DOI: 10.1134/1.1804214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulence spectra generated by singularities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
59
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
11
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the same ω −4 spectrum was predicted by Kuznetsov (Ku) [6] based on the assumption that the dominant contribution to the power-law scaling comes from sharp wave-crests with one-dimensional ridges whose velocity remains nearly constant while crossing the wire probe. Obviously, the nonlinearity of such wave-crests is high and one cannot use the linear dispersion relation for obtaining the space statistics out of the time statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the same ω −4 spectrum was predicted by Kuznetsov (Ku) [6] based on the assumption that the dominant contribution to the power-law scaling comes from sharp wave-crests with one-dimensional ridges whose velocity remains nearly constant while crossing the wire probe. Obviously, the nonlinearity of such wave-crests is high and one cannot use the linear dispersion relation for obtaining the space statistics out of the time statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Kuznetsov [6] questioned this picture and argued that (i) slope breaks occur on onedimensional lines/ridges rather than on zero-dimensional point/peaks, and (ii) that the wave-crest is propagating with preserved shape, i.e. ω ∝ k should be used instead of the linear wave relation ω = √ gk.…”
Section: Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a range of intensities where the PH slope ν = 5 is observed, and we report that wave breaking events were common for such intensities. At higher intensities, one can see the ν = 4 slope which is predicted by both ZF and Kuznetsov theories [3,11]. However, the water surface was visibly very choppy with numerous frequent wavebreaking and high values of the surface slope, γ > 0.15, and rules out the weak nonlinearity assumption which is the basis of ZF theory [3].…”
Section: Spectramentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the water surface was visibly very choppy with numerous frequent wavebreaking and high values of the surface slope, γ > 0.15, and rules out the weak nonlinearity assumption which is the basis of ZF theory [3]. Kuznetsov theory [11] is more likely to be relevant to these conditions, because it derives ν = 4 value from considering strongly nonlinear wavecrests with sharp 1D ridges and the speed of which is nearly constant while they pass the height gauge. However, there is no visible plateau in Figure 7 at ν = 4 value and ν takes bigger values at lower intensities and lower values for greater amplitudes (reaching ν = 3.3 for the maximum intensity of γ ≈ 0.21).…”
Section: Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation