1992
DOI: 10.2514/3.10969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulence model effects on separated flow about a prolate spheroid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This modifica tion has led to the ability to accurately simulate steady vortical flows with RANS computations. An example of the improvements to both zero-equation and oneequation turbulence models for predicting vortical flowfields was done by Gee et al [22]. Vortical flow modifications for the k À e turbulence model have also been suggested [23] and have been applied to flow over slender bodies at high incidence angles [24].…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modifica tion has led to the ability to accurately simulate steady vortical flows with RANS computations. An example of the improvements to both zero-equation and oneequation turbulence models for predicting vortical flowfields was done by Gee et al [22]. Vortical flow modifications for the k À e turbulence model have also been suggested [23] and have been applied to flow over slender bodies at high incidence angles [24].…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, U ∞ is the velocity of the model, L the length of the model, and ν the fluid viscosity. To validate turbulence models, the prolate spheroid has been investigated with a broad variety of experimental approaches over the last decades (Gee et al 1992;Choi and Kwon 2015). Fu et al (1994) used planar particle image velocimetry (PIV) to capture the instantaneous spanwise velocity and vorticity distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,5] for a detailed discussion). Gee et al [6] compared several implementations of the Baldwin-Lomax model for computing the flow about a 6:1 prolate spheroid at high angle of attack, and also proposed an extension similar to the Degani-Schiff corrections [2] for the Johnson-King model. Murman and Chaderjian [5] compared two implementations of the Degani-Schiff corrections to the Baldwin-Lomax model for computing the flow about a tangentogive cylinder at α = 20 • , and found that the original implementation is necessary in order to predict the correct primary crossflow separation from smooth bodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%