2018
DOI: 10.3390/w10030286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulence Measurement of Vertical Dense Jets in Crossflow

Abstract: Turbulence measurement of a dense jet perpendicularly issued into a crossflow is investigated experimentally. The flow-velocity components were extensively measured with a high frequency Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) system, whereas, a Micro Scale Conductivity Temperature instrument was used to measure the jet salinity. Special attention is given to understand the jet flow-structures in the flow symmetry plane. The flow velocity-fields, the jet trajectory, the turbulence intensities, the turbulent kinetic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(79 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When it reaches one half of the river width, u 0 begins to bend, a horseshoe vortex appears downstream and a pair of reverse vortices are formed in the wake region of the jet backwater, moving downstream along the flow direction. The jet enters the water body without vegetation, and the speed gradually decreases, which is consistent with the results of Xiao [37] and Ben [33]. Figure 4b shows that with single-row vegetation (V1J1), the maximum jet velocity of u max = 0.065 m/s was reached at the jet nozzle.…”
Section: Distribution Of the Average Flow Field In Transverse Jets Unsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When it reaches one half of the river width, u 0 begins to bend, a horseshoe vortex appears downstream and a pair of reverse vortices are formed in the wake region of the jet backwater, moving downstream along the flow direction. The jet enters the water body without vegetation, and the speed gradually decreases, which is consistent with the results of Xiao [37] and Ben [33]. Figure 4b shows that with single-row vegetation (V1J1), the maximum jet velocity of u max = 0.065 m/s was reached at the jet nozzle.…”
Section: Distribution Of the Average Flow Field In Transverse Jets Unsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Similarly, Malcangio et al [32] showed that rigid vegetation had a significant effect on the lateral circular orifice floating jet; it decreased the flow velocity in the crossflow and increased the penetration height and dilution of the jet significantly. Meftah et al [33] observed vertical dense jets in a crossflow, flow field, jet trajectory, turbulence intensity, turbulent kinetic energy, turbulent length scale and diffusion coefficient with an emphasis on the higher turbulence intensity of the jet field and the higher turbulent energy. When there was no jet, the environmental flow field was isotropic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquired data were filtered based on the Tukey's method and bad samples (SNR < 15 db and correlation coefficient < 70%) were also removed. Additional details concerning the ADV-system operations can be found in [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Flow velocity measurements through the scour hole were carried out for different configurations in both the longitudinal plane of symmetry and in some transversal planes.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of the eddies scales in a turbulent flow is of crucial importance for experimental and numerical investigations, defining suitable domain-dimensions (area or volume) for computation [20]. Since the condition of incipient movement of the sediment particles is significantly influenced by the size of turbulent eddies, in this section, we try to experimentally determine the characteristic eddy length scales of the turbulent flow in the scour hole at equilibrium condition.…”
Section: Turbulent Length Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not least, the contents of the papers serve to highlight key priority areas, knowledge gaps, and growth points in research activity in river, coastal, estuarine, and near-shore environments. The 15 papers contained within the Special Issue reflect the range of problems where new high quality data from laboratory and CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) modelling studies, and field measurements aid the interpretation of classical flow features in complex flows in: (1) Open channels, river mouths and river canyons [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]; (2) breaking waves and wave-current interactions in coastal zones [9][10][11][12][13][14]; and (3) gravity currents in natural channels [15]. Most significantly, the papers provide examples of where emerging problems associated with the disposal of dense brine into the aquatic environment are being tackled by detailed measurements of the turbulence properties of the flows.…”
Section: Introduction To the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%