2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10652-009-9131-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulence characteristics within sparse and dense canopies

Abstract: International audienceBoundary layer interactions with canopies control various environmental processes. In the case of dense and homogeneous canopies, the so-called mixing layer analogy is most generally used. When the canopy becomes sparser, a transition occurs between the mixing layer and the boundary layer perturbed by interactions between element wakes. This transition has still to be fully understood and characterized. The experimental work presented here deals with the effect of the canopy density on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(121 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the case of λ = 0.25 for the aligned array, the region within the urban canopy is mostly occupied by flow recirculations and the flow within the canopy is almost completely separated from the boundary-layer flow above. This flow pattern is often classified as skimming flow in the literature (Perrier et al 1972;Wieringa 1993;Pietri et al 2009). On the other hand, for the case of λf = 0.028 for the staggered array, the flow within and above the cube array is similar to the semi-smooth turbulent flow conditions within and above a sparse canopy.…”
Section: Flow Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case of λ = 0.25 for the aligned array, the region within the urban canopy is mostly occupied by flow recirculations and the flow within the canopy is almost completely separated from the boundary-layer flow above. This flow pattern is often classified as skimming flow in the literature (Perrier et al 1972;Wieringa 1993;Pietri et al 2009). On the other hand, for the case of λf = 0.028 for the staggered array, the flow within and above the cube array is similar to the semi-smooth turbulent flow conditions within and above a sparse canopy.…”
Section: Flow Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different and often confusing definitions of sparse and dense canopies exist in the literature. Luhar et al (2008) and Pietri et al (2009) define a sparse canopy as one in which the velocity profile approaches that of a turbulent boundary layer, while in a dense canopy the drag discontinuity at the top of the canopy creates an inflection point in the velocity profile. This definition is too general and overlooks intermediate scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed methodology has been tested with experimental measurements in a canopy flow with a simplified geometry, carried out in a laboratory channel of the Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering of the University of Naples Federico II (Naples, Italy), since the focus of this paper is on the application of the KC complexity, not on the base flow. However, it should be pointed out that in the last decade, some authors performed measurements both on more realistic geometries and using more advanced techniques, at least 2C laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%