1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00878026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbidity and mass concentration of suspended matter in lake water: A comparison of two calibration methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The ranges of b m (550 nm) in Oct 2006, Mar 2007, and Nov 2007 in Taihu Lake were 0.221-1.551, 0.436-1.138, and 0.406-1.271, respectively. The average values of b m (550 nm) for the same periods were 0.590, 0.597, and 0.714, respectively, which are within the range of 0.1-0.8 provided by Hofmann and Dominik (1995). Upon comparing with the results of Babin et al (2003) and Stramski et al (2004b) (Table 3), b m (550 nm) for Taihu Lake was found to be similar to those for the North Sea and English Channel.…”
Section: Specific Scattering Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ranges of b m (550 nm) in Oct 2006, Mar 2007, and Nov 2007 in Taihu Lake were 0.221-1.551, 0.436-1.138, and 0.406-1.271, respectively. The average values of b m (550 nm) for the same periods were 0.590, 0.597, and 0.714, respectively, which are within the range of 0.1-0.8 provided by Hofmann and Dominik (1995). Upon comparing with the results of Babin et al (2003) and Stramski et al (2004b) (Table 3), b m (550 nm) for Taihu Lake was found to be similar to those for the North Sea and English Channel.…”
Section: Specific Scattering Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The differences between n values and the size distributions of organic and inorganic matter Some sample points with highly anomalous data were removed SD standard deviation, CV coefficient of variation (Babin et al 2003). Hofmann and Dominik (1995) considered the range of b m (550 nm) for turbid water to be 0.1-0.8. The ranges of b m (550 nm) in Oct 2006, Mar 2007, and Nov 2007 in Taihu Lake were 0.221-1.551, 0.436-1.138, and 0.406-1.271, respectively.…”
Section: Specific Scattering Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of mass-specific scattering coefficient, b p * (k) = b p (k)/TSM (m 2 g -1 ), generally vary between 0.1 and 0.8 m 2 g -1 in case 2 waters (Baker & Lavelle, 1984;Hofmann & Dominik, 1995;Baker et al, 2001), while the average b p m (550) in case 1 waters is around 1.0 m 2 g -1 (Gordon & Morel, 1983). Babin et al (2003) also reported similar results, that is, an average b p m (555) of 0.51 m 2 g -1 for case 2 waters and 1.0 m 2 g -1 for case 1 waters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suspended particle concentrations (CL) were determined by the same procedure as for river samples. Since suspended matter in natural water consists of specific mixtures of different sizes and types of particles, calibration is required to determine CL based on in situ light transmission [Baker and Lavelle, 1984;Gordon et al, 1984;Hofmann and Dominik, 1995]. Light attenuation at 660 nm can unambiguously be related to particle concentrations assuming that the particle mixture is homogeneous and the attenuation by the water is constant [Boss et al, 2001].…”
Section: Particle Distributions In Downstream Lake Brienzmentioning
confidence: 99%