2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2012.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuple switching network—When slower may be better

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each node is a standalone computer with any number of cores, local memory, storage and multiple network interfaces. UVR (Unidirectional Virtual Ring) implements a Service Content Addressable Network (or Tuple Switching Network (TSN) [16]) using all available processing and networking components. This allows zero single point failures regardless the number of networks and processors for a given application.…”
Section: Single-sided Statistic Multiplexingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each node is a standalone computer with any number of cores, local memory, storage and multiple network interfaces. UVR (Unidirectional Virtual Ring) implements a Service Content Addressable Network (or Tuple Switching Network (TSN) [16]) using all available processing and networking components. This allows zero single point failures regardless the number of networks and processors for a given application.…”
Section: Single-sided Statistic Multiplexingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous attempts include the Linda project [21] and more recently Synergy [14]. While these projects have added a set of innovations to SPP the current implementation improves on these projects by providing two main improvements: 1) A Distributed Compute Space to reduce the IO bottleneck on the master when scaling the application [20] and to decouple the compute space data from the master process. 2) Master Spatial Redundancy to provide master process fault tolerance, contrary to the viable but less portable checkpoint restart mechanism that was designed previously in [12] A.…”
Section: Implementation and Failures Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%