Abstract:Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a bone marrow derived blood cancer where intercellular communication in the leukemic bone marrow participates in disease development, progression and chemoresistance. Tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) are intercellular communication structures involved in transport of cellular contents and pathogens, also demonstrated to play a role in both cell death modulation and chemoresistance. Here we investigated the presence of TNTs by live fluorescent microscopy and identified TNT formation be… Show more
“…Since the tyrosine kinase ABL1 and the oncogenic fusion protein BCR‐ABL1 include distinct F‐ and G‐actin binding domains with actin bundling activity, we examined various BCR‐ABL1 expressing cells with respect to TNT formation. BCR‐ABL1 positive CML cells, cell lines, and patient‐derived cells, displayed limited numbers or absence of TNT formation compared to acute myeloid leukemia cells, stromal cells and other cancer cells . TNT formation between cells in vitro is highly dependent on adherence, and culturing leukocytes on a supportive layer of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) or fibronectin increases TNT formation .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following were used for actin and membrane staining: Alexa Fluor 350-conjugated phalloidin and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)-Alexa Fluor 594 or 488 (Invitrogen) as previously described. 31 TKIs: imatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, ponatinib, and dasatinib (Selleckchem). IFNα (Intron A from MSD), Cytochalasin D (Sigma-Aldrich), doxycycline (Doxyferm, Nordic Drugs AB, Limhamn), puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich), Bovine serum albumin (BSA) fraction V (Roche), fibronectin (Sigma-Aldrich).…”
Section: Antibodies and Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TNTs were distinguished from cytoplasmic bridges, which appear following cell division, by the lack of a midbody clearly visible by differential interference contrast and/or staining of cellular membranes. 31 8-well µ-slides (Ibidi GmbH) were pre-coated with fibronectin (10 µg/mL, F2006, Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 minutes at 37°C before washed with saline. 70 000 cells were seeded per well and incubated overnight under physiological conditions.…”
Section: Tnt Identification and Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are involved in cell‐to‐cell interaction and intercellular transport of organelles and pathogens such as virus and bacteria . Leukocytes, their leukemic counterparts and bone marrow stromal cells have all been reported to form TNTs in vitro . TNT is proposed to be a mechanism for chemo resistance by transport of oncoproteins between T and B cells as well as in colon cancer cells, by transfer of mitochondria from endothelial cells to chemotherapy exposed cancer cells, or by induced drug‐efflux in aggressive forms of pancreatic carcinoma .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Leukocytes, their leukemic counterparts and bone marrow stromal cells have all been reported to form TNTs in vitro. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] TNT is proposed to be a mechanism for chemo resistance by transport of oncoproteins between T and B cells as well as in colon cancer cells, by transfer of mitochondria from endothelial cells to chemotherapy exposed cancer cells, or by induced drug-efflux in aggressive forms of pancreatic carcinoma. [33][34][35][36][37][38] The impact of TNTs in vivo is so far not well characterized, but they have been described to connect myeloid cells in the cornea of mouse 39,40 and in fresh resected tumor samples from patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma.…”
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a stem cell disease of the bone marrow where mechanisms of inter‐leukemic communication and cell‐to‐cell interactions are proposed to be important for optimal therapy response. Tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) are novel intercellular communication structures transporting different cargos with potential implications in therapy resistance. Here, we have investigated TNTs in CML cells and following treatment with the highly effective CML therapeutics tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and interferon‐α (IFNα). CML cells from chronic phase CML patients as well as the blast crisis phase cell lines, Kcl‐22 and K562, formed few or no TNTs. Treatment with imatinib increased TNT formation in both Kcl‐22 and K562 cells, while nilotinib or IFNα increased TNTs in Kcl‐22 cells only where the TNT increase was associated with adherence to fibronectin‐coated surfaces, altered morphology, and reduced movement involving β1integrin. Ex vivo treated cells from chronic phase CML patients showed limited changes in TNT formation similarly to bone marrow cells from healthy individuals. Interestingly, in vivo nilotinib treatment in a Kcl‐22 subcutaneous mouse model resulted in morphological changes and TNT‐like structures in the tumor‐derived Kcl‐22 cells. Our results demonstrate that CML cells express low levels of TNTs, but CML therapeutics increase TNT formation in designated cell models indicating TNT functionality in bone marrow derived malignancies and their microenvironment.
“…Since the tyrosine kinase ABL1 and the oncogenic fusion protein BCR‐ABL1 include distinct F‐ and G‐actin binding domains with actin bundling activity, we examined various BCR‐ABL1 expressing cells with respect to TNT formation. BCR‐ABL1 positive CML cells, cell lines, and patient‐derived cells, displayed limited numbers or absence of TNT formation compared to acute myeloid leukemia cells, stromal cells and other cancer cells . TNT formation between cells in vitro is highly dependent on adherence, and culturing leukocytes on a supportive layer of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) or fibronectin increases TNT formation .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following were used for actin and membrane staining: Alexa Fluor 350-conjugated phalloidin and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)-Alexa Fluor 594 or 488 (Invitrogen) as previously described. 31 TKIs: imatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, ponatinib, and dasatinib (Selleckchem). IFNα (Intron A from MSD), Cytochalasin D (Sigma-Aldrich), doxycycline (Doxyferm, Nordic Drugs AB, Limhamn), puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich), Bovine serum albumin (BSA) fraction V (Roche), fibronectin (Sigma-Aldrich).…”
Section: Antibodies and Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TNTs were distinguished from cytoplasmic bridges, which appear following cell division, by the lack of a midbody clearly visible by differential interference contrast and/or staining of cellular membranes. 31 8-well µ-slides (Ibidi GmbH) were pre-coated with fibronectin (10 µg/mL, F2006, Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 minutes at 37°C before washed with saline. 70 000 cells were seeded per well and incubated overnight under physiological conditions.…”
Section: Tnt Identification and Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are involved in cell‐to‐cell interaction and intercellular transport of organelles and pathogens such as virus and bacteria . Leukocytes, their leukemic counterparts and bone marrow stromal cells have all been reported to form TNTs in vitro . TNT is proposed to be a mechanism for chemo resistance by transport of oncoproteins between T and B cells as well as in colon cancer cells, by transfer of mitochondria from endothelial cells to chemotherapy exposed cancer cells, or by induced drug‐efflux in aggressive forms of pancreatic carcinoma .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Leukocytes, their leukemic counterparts and bone marrow stromal cells have all been reported to form TNTs in vitro. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] TNT is proposed to be a mechanism for chemo resistance by transport of oncoproteins between T and B cells as well as in colon cancer cells, by transfer of mitochondria from endothelial cells to chemotherapy exposed cancer cells, or by induced drug-efflux in aggressive forms of pancreatic carcinoma. [33][34][35][36][37][38] The impact of TNTs in vivo is so far not well characterized, but they have been described to connect myeloid cells in the cornea of mouse 39,40 and in fresh resected tumor samples from patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma.…”
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a stem cell disease of the bone marrow where mechanisms of inter‐leukemic communication and cell‐to‐cell interactions are proposed to be important for optimal therapy response. Tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) are novel intercellular communication structures transporting different cargos with potential implications in therapy resistance. Here, we have investigated TNTs in CML cells and following treatment with the highly effective CML therapeutics tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and interferon‐α (IFNα). CML cells from chronic phase CML patients as well as the blast crisis phase cell lines, Kcl‐22 and K562, formed few or no TNTs. Treatment with imatinib increased TNT formation in both Kcl‐22 and K562 cells, while nilotinib or IFNα increased TNTs in Kcl‐22 cells only where the TNT increase was associated with adherence to fibronectin‐coated surfaces, altered morphology, and reduced movement involving β1integrin. Ex vivo treated cells from chronic phase CML patients showed limited changes in TNT formation similarly to bone marrow cells from healthy individuals. Interestingly, in vivo nilotinib treatment in a Kcl‐22 subcutaneous mouse model resulted in morphological changes and TNT‐like structures in the tumor‐derived Kcl‐22 cells. Our results demonstrate that CML cells express low levels of TNTs, but CML therapeutics increase TNT formation in designated cell models indicating TNT functionality in bone marrow derived malignancies and their microenvironment.
BackgroundThe concept of tumour heterogeneity is not novel but is fast becoming a paradigm by which to explain part of the highly recalcitrant nature of aggressive malignant tumours. Glioblastoma is a prime example of such difficult‐to‐treat, invasive, and incurable malignancies. With the advent of the post‐genomic age and increased access to next‐generation sequencing technologies, numerous publications have described the presence and extent of intratumoural and intertumoural heterogeneity present in glioblastoma. Moreover, there have been numerous reports more directly correlating the heterogeneity of glioblastoma to its refractory, reoccurring, and inevitably terminal nature. It is therefore prudent to consider the different forms of heterogeneity seen in glioblastoma and how to harness this understanding to better strategize novel therapeutic approaches. One of the most central questions of tumour heterogeneity is how these numerous different cell types (both tumour and non‐tumour) in the tumour mass communicate.Recent findingsThis chapter provides a brief review on the variable heterogeneity of glioblastoma, with a focus on cellular heterogeneity and on modalities of communication that can induce further molecular diversity within the complex and ever‐evolving tumour microenvironment. We provide particular emphasis on the emerging role of actin‐based cellular conduits called tunnelling nanotubes (TNTs) and tumour microtubes (TMs) and outline the perceived current problems in the field that need to be resolved before pharmacological targeting of TNTs can become a reality.ConclusionsWe conclude that TNTs and TMs provide a new and exciting avenue for the therapeutic targeting of glioblastoma and that numerous inroads have already made into TNT and TM biology. However, to target TMs and TNTs, several advances must be made before this aim can become a reality.
Background
Despite the remarkable breakthroughs achieved in the management of metastatic melanoma using immunotherapy and targeted therapies, long‐term clinical efficacy is often compromised due to dose‐limiting toxicity and innate or acquired resistance. Therefore, it is of vital importance to further explore the molecular mechanisms underlying melanoma progression and identify new targeted therapeutic approaches.
Methods
The function of eukaryotic elongation factor‐2 kinase (EEF2K) in melanoma were investigated in vitro and in vivo. RNA‐seq and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay were undertaken to explore the mechanisms. The antitumor effect of bromodomain and extra terminal domain (BET) inhibitors combined with cytarabine were assessed in melanoma both in vitro and in vivo.
Results
EEF2K silencing markedly attenuated the malignant phenotypes of melanoma cells, including proliferation, migration, invasion and metastasis. In contrast, EEF2K overexpression promoted melanoma cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that EEF2K upregulates the phosphorylation of STAT3 (p‐STAT3) at Tyr705, which binds to the promoter region of SPP1 and enhances its transcription, thus facilitating melanoma progression. Transfection‐induced re‐expression of SPP1 partly negated the inhibitory effect of EEF2K silencing on melanoma, whereas inhibition of SPP1 or STAT3 significantly abolished the efficacy of EEF2K on melanoma cells. Intriguingly, EEF2K silencing combined with BET inhibitor treatment further inhibited cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis in melanoma. We further screened the US FDA‐approved antitumour drug library and identified cytarabine as a potential clinically applicable EEF2K inhibitor that could synergise with BET inhibitors in melanoma treatment.
Conclusion
EEF2K/p‐STAT3/SPP1 may be a novel oncogenic pathway in melanoma progression, which could be a target for novel combination therapy for melanoma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.