2004
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2003.821167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunneling Magnetoresistive Heads Beyond 150>tex<$hboxGb/in^2$>/tex<

Abstract: Tunneling magnetoresistive (TMR) readers capable of 150 Gb/in 2 of areal density magnetic recording for hard disk drive were demonstrated with bit-error-rate performance. The head design used is basically a bottom type stack of Ta/PtMn/CoFe/ Ru/CoFe/oxide barrier/CoFe/NiFe/Ta cap with abutted hard bias stabilization. The electrical reader width is about 4 to reach a very high track density and shield-to-shield spacing is about 700 A for high linear density. On-track bit error floor is better than 10 5 at a lin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20,21) We also obtained TMR ratios of 130% at RA ¼ 1:7 mm 2 and 165% at RA ¼ 2:9 mm 2 , which are about eight to ten times greater than the ratios of aluminum oxide barrier MTJs with similar RA. 22,23) Figure 3 shows the bias voltage dependence of TMR ratio at 5 K and RT for a MTJ with a 1.5-nm-thick MgO barrier deposited at 10 mTorr and annealed at 400 C. This device has a Ru underlayer. The bias voltage was defined as positive when electrons were flowing from the bottom to the top layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21) We also obtained TMR ratios of 130% at RA ¼ 1:7 mm 2 and 165% at RA ¼ 2:9 mm 2 , which are about eight to ten times greater than the ratios of aluminum oxide barrier MTJs with similar RA. 22,23) Figure 3 shows the bias voltage dependence of TMR ratio at 5 K and RT for a MTJ with a 1.5-nm-thick MgO barrier deposited at 10 mTorr and annealed at 400 C. This device has a Ru underlayer. The bias voltage was defined as positive when electrons were flowing from the bottom to the top layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one channel, spin polarized electrons tunnel through the oxide barrier giving rise to the TMR effect and sensor‐like magnetic field dependence while in the other conduction channel there is no spin polarization of the electrical current which gives rise to a pure resistance change without an impact on the magnetic properties of the tunneling channel. [ 53,54 ] The data in Figure 3d shows a linear correlation between TMR and the calculated resistance × area product which is the signature of a two‐channel conduction mechanism where a spin‐dependent tunneling path and a parallel spin‐independent conduction path coexist. This is the reason the LRS shows no TMR signal, by creating a conducting path through the oxide effectively we shunted the barrier with an variable resistor that depends on the amplitude of the applied voltage bias, as schematized in the inset of Figure 3d.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As we can expect, magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) has also been utilized to develop biosensors [54, 101], which is the current technology widely used for read heads in hard disk drives [55]. While GMR relies on spin-dependent scattering of electrons between magnetic layers, MTJ is involved with spin-dependent tunneling effect.…”
Section: Magnetic Sensor Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%