2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13206-8_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TuningGenie: Auto-Tuning Framework Based on Rewriting Rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard approaches for cuBLAS matrix multiplications optimization are described in [5], advanced autotuning result is presented in [6]. The autotuning approach [7] has many pros but a kind of contra -the tuned library is fast "in common sense" as the target parameter is time, and sometimes additional resource restrictions apply (e.g. less time -more memory or software depends on "hot cache") and a library may use very specific dataset, and this is common for the most of computational tasks -Fourier transforms have only one or two used dimensions, matrices have only several fixed dimensions.…”
Section: Software Performance Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard approaches for cuBLAS matrix multiplications optimization are described in [5], advanced autotuning result is presented in [6]. The autotuning approach [7] has many pros but a kind of contra -the tuned library is fast "in common sense" as the target parameter is time, and sometimes additional resource restrictions apply (e.g. less time -more memory or software depends on "hot cache") and a library may use very specific dataset, and this is common for the most of computational tasks -Fourier transforms have only one or two used dimensions, matrices have only several fixed dimensions.…”
Section: Software Performance Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%