2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4nr01322k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning TiO2nanoparticle morphology in graphene–TiO2hybrids by graphene surface modification

Abstract: We report the hydrothermal synthesis of graphene (GNP)-TiO2 nanoparticle (NP) hybrids using COOH and NH2 functionalized GNP as shape controller. Anatase was the only TiO2 crystalline phase nucleated on the functionalized GNP, whereas traces of rutile were detected on unfunctionalized GNP. X-Ray Photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) showed C-Ti bonds on all hybrids, thus confirming heterogeneous nucleation. GNP functionalization induced the nucleation of TiO2 NPs with specific shape and crystalline facets exposed. C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
57
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
4
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5b). A lattice spacing of 0.34 nm could be clearly observed, corresponding to TiO 2 in PIL@TiO 2 [32]. The no-lattice spacing section is attributed to the PIL, which is the amorphous nature [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…5b). A lattice spacing of 0.34 nm could be clearly observed, corresponding to TiO 2 in PIL@TiO 2 [32]. The no-lattice spacing section is attributed to the PIL, which is the amorphous nature [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Interestingly, the fitting peak at ca. 454.5 eV in the Ti2p spectra of 0.5% Ti-Bran catalyst might be ascribed to the substitution of oxygen by carbon species in the TiO 2 lattice and formation of TieC bond which can also be observed in the C1s spectra from the peak at 282.2 eV (Liu et al, 2014;Sordello et al, 2014). The difference in the fitting peak for Ti2p of 454.5 eV and 458.3 eV is potentially resulted from the presence of CeTieO bond in the TiO 2 lattice that the electronegativity of C (2.55) is lower than that of O (3.44) which results in more electron-rich in TieO bond and further affects the difference in binding energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Meanwhile, two peaks with binding energy at 400.7 eV could be observed in N 1s spectra of the V‐N‐C @Al‐SBA‐15 sample (Figure c). This peak shows binding energy for the amide group (CO–NH‐C) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%