2023
DOI: 10.1002/admt.202201200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning the Solar Performance of Building Facades through Polymer 3D Printing: Toward Bespoke Thermo‐Optical Properties

Abstract: sector accounts for 34% of energy demand and 37% of energy-related CO 2 emissions globally. [2] In buildings, a major portion of the footprint concentrates in the first year of the life cycle and results from embodied emission of material and components. This relative contribution is expected to reach values as high as 50% of the total emissions as energy efficiency in buildings increases. [3] At the moment, despite the continued power sector decarbonization and the adoption of climate-change mitigation polici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon may mainly be associated with possible printing failures arising at lower percentage densities that affect the U-value, as seen in Figure 11, which shows the post-test state of the Hilbert curve geometry specimen with 5% density. Analogous behaviour was also identified in the study [36] using a robotic polymer extruder, where thermal transmittance (U-value) varied from 1.7 to 1.0 W/(m 2 .K) only by changing the infill density. The best performance was obtained using higher infill densities, which is consistent with the values obtained in this study, where the U-values vary between 1.7 and 1.8 W/(m 2 .K) for 5% infill density and 0.4-0.8 W/(m 2 .K) for 25% infill density.…”
Section: Thermal Performancesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This phenomenon may mainly be associated with possible printing failures arising at lower percentage densities that affect the U-value, as seen in Figure 11, which shows the post-test state of the Hilbert curve geometry specimen with 5% density. Analogous behaviour was also identified in the study [36] using a robotic polymer extruder, where thermal transmittance (U-value) varied from 1.7 to 1.0 W/(m 2 .K) only by changing the infill density. The best performance was obtained using higher infill densities, which is consistent with the values obtained in this study, where the U-values vary between 1.7 and 1.8 W/(m 2 .K) for 5% infill density and 0.4-0.8 W/(m 2 .K) for 25% infill density.…”
Section: Thermal Performancesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Finally, to fully characterize the performance of translucent 3DP facades, the influence of solar radiation on the heat transfer needs to be investigated, considering the geometrical complexity of the elements. 3D printing creates anisotropic elements with layered resolutions, resulting in angle-dependent, directional transmission of solar radiation [47]. By coupling thermal and optical domains, we can define seasonal/temperature-dependent solar heat gain coefficients (SHGC) and U-values, which would better capture the component behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This material was selected due to its biocompatibility, Sustainability 2024, 16, 2166 6 of 28 UV resistance, mechanical performance, and market availability [42,43]. PET-G is also used as a building façade material in some studies regarding 3D-printed building façade solutions [44,45]. Since PET-G is non-toxic, bio-compatible, UV-resistant, and food-safe, it is used in healthcare and food industries [46,47].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%