2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4934017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning the critical solution temperature of polymers by copolymerization

Abstract: We study statistical copolymerization effects on the upper critical solution temperature (CST) of generic homopolymers by means of coarse-grained Langevin dynamics computer simulations and mean-field theory. Our systematic investigation reveals that the CST can change monotonically or non-monotonically with copolymerization, as observed in experimental studies, depending on the degree of non-additivity of the monomer (A-B) cross-interactions. The simulation findings are confirmed and qualitatively explained by… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(13), increasing the fractions of hydrophobic (represented by ni) or hydrophilic (represented by mi) units (see Figure 3(a)), linearly changes T ℓ of a copolymer chain. Because of this linear behavior, which was also observed in a generic molecular simulation study (80), these copolymer sequences provide a rather flexible molecular toolbox for desired applications. Moreover, these systems also show severe Here the hydrophobic methylene units (represented by n 1 and n 2 ) and hydrophilic ethylene oxide units (represented by m 1 and m 2 ) are tuned to obtain different amphiphilic sequences.…”
Section: Effect Of Copolymer Sequencementioning
confidence: 66%
“…(13), increasing the fractions of hydrophobic (represented by ni) or hydrophilic (represented by mi) units (see Figure 3(a)), linearly changes T ℓ of a copolymer chain. Because of this linear behavior, which was also observed in a generic molecular simulation study (80), these copolymer sequences provide a rather flexible molecular toolbox for desired applications. Moreover, these systems also show severe Here the hydrophobic methylene units (represented by n 1 and n 2 ) and hydrophilic ethylene oxide units (represented by m 1 and m 2 ) are tuned to obtain different amphiphilic sequences.…”
Section: Effect Of Copolymer Sequencementioning
confidence: 66%
“…For example, T ℓ ≈ 300 − 305 K for X = Valine [80], while T ℓ ≈ 305 − 310 K for X = Glycine (i.e., more hydrophilic residue) [44,80]. This is identical to the typical LCST based copolymers, where T ℓ can be tuned by changing hydrophobic or hydrophilic units along the backbone [19,40,41,63]. Therefore, for this study we investigate two sequences, namely −(VPGVG)− and −(VPGGG)−, for T < T ℓ .…”
Section: Conformation Of Elastin-like Polypeptides In Aqueous Ethanolmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…[25] This effect of hydrophobic comonomers on the polymer transition temperature is well captured also in a simulation or theory context. [26] Besides its thermosensitivity, the response of PNIPAM to pressure is often overlooked: [27] precipitated (> LCST) PNIPAM can be re-solvated by increasing pressure. [28] Theoretically, this effect can be explained by the pressure-induced decrease of the volume of the solventinaccessible cavities, which are formed by hydrophobic interactions.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%