2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning surface properties of bone biomaterials to manipulate osteoblastic cell adhesion and the signaling pathways for the enhancement of early osseointegration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
116
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
116
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect has already been observed in polymers that better expose hydroxyl or carboxylic acid groups at the surface only when hydrated (Ratner, ). Most studies show that a hydrophilic surface is more conductive to the attachment of cells (Chen et al, ). In the present study, a very high statistically significant difference ( p < .001) between the WCA values was obtained when comparing the pure PLA scaffolds group with the composite groups of samples, with mean reduction of a 5.5% (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect has already been observed in polymers that better expose hydroxyl or carboxylic acid groups at the surface only when hydrated (Ratner, ). Most studies show that a hydrophilic surface is more conductive to the attachment of cells (Chen et al, ). In the present study, a very high statistically significant difference ( p < .001) between the WCA values was obtained when comparing the pure PLA scaffolds group with the composite groups of samples, with mean reduction of a 5.5% (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, a very high statistically significant difference ( p < .001) between the WCA values was obtained when comparing the pure PLA scaffolds group with the composite groups of samples, with mean reduction of a 5.5% (Table ). The decrease of the hydrophobicity of the scaffolds surface, coupled with the increase of its roughness and microporosity, led to enhanced metabolic activity of cells adhered to the composite scaffolds (Chen et al, ; Perez & Mestres, ), as shown in Figure . However, the adhesive properties of cells after 7 days of culture appeared to be unaffected by the presence of the additives in the PLA‐based scaffolds (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PLA is a hydrophobic material and, as a consequence, its interaction with the extracellular matrix (ECM) is low [7]. As the adsorption of adhesion-signaling proteins from the ECM is a key step to promote a good osseointegration of the scaffolds [8], the limited affinity of this biomaterial to these substances in the ECM is one of the main drawbacks of PLA-based structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Results from these studies have unequivocally established that physicochemical properties such as roughness, topography, surface chemistry, energy and stiffness, direct cell fate by affecting key phenomena including adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, gene and protein expression. [8][9][10][11] Among the factors known to control cellular events, nano-topographical features play a pivotal role by exerting direct cueing on adherent cells. 2,9,10,[12][13][14][15][16][17] Based on this evidence, much effort has been invested in the design of synthetic nanostructured substrates to support the investigation of the interplay between nanotopographical cues and cellular functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%