2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning surface morphology and crystallinity of anodic TiO2 nanotubes and their response to biomimetic bone growth for implant applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While this equation provided an approximation of the oxide phase ratio present, it was based on the assumption that the oxide layers were fully crystalline. A number of previous studies combining anodization with subsequent heat treatment processing, as well the previous study in our own laboratories, have suggested that many of these anodized oxide layers may not be fully crystalline. Additionally, XRD analyses provide macroscopic information on the oxide phases present, but no information on the microscopic spatial distribution of these oxide phases within the anodized layers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…While this equation provided an approximation of the oxide phase ratio present, it was based on the assumption that the oxide layers were fully crystalline. A number of previous studies combining anodization with subsequent heat treatment processing, as well the previous study in our own laboratories, have suggested that many of these anodized oxide layers may not be fully crystalline. Additionally, XRD analyses provide macroscopic information on the oxide phases present, but no information on the microscopic spatial distribution of these oxide phases within the anodized layers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As in the case of as-anodized surfaces, the same tendency was noted for annealed state of both ground and polished surfaces, the coating feature remained significantly affected by the surface treatment before anodization ( Figure 5). Several studies [1,3,6,15] confirmed that the as-anodized TiO2 nanotubes are in amorphous state. However, when they are heat-treated at higher temperatures, the NTs crystallize to anatase phase or a mix of anatase and rutile phases.…”
Section: Microstructure Before and After Anodizationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…So, the decreasing diameter could be caused by phase transformation of amorphous NT TiO2 to crystalline state in the coating layer as it was confirmed by the results of XRD and Raman spectroscopy. During annealing, the density of NT changes in relation with sintering and Several studies [1,3,6,15] confirmed that the as-anodized TiO 2 nanotubes are in amorphous state. However, when they are heat-treated at higher temperatures, the NTs crystallize to anatase phase or a mix of anatase and rutile phases.…”
Section: Microstructure Before and After Anodizationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations