2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0121-3_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning Outer Segment Ca2+Homeostasis to Phototransduction in Rods and Cones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…6E) at the level of the connecting cilium and the anatomical substrate for this IS staining remains to be determined. Given the canonical view of Ca 2+ regulation in photoreceptor outer segments (Fain et al, 2001;Korenbrot and Rebrik, 2002), the staining of outer segments of cones by the SERCA3 antibody was unexpected. Several lines of evidence suggest that the antigen recognition by N89, the SERCA3 antibody, was specific: (1) Western blots from whole mouse retinas probed with the SERCA3 antibody showed a distinct band at 97 kDa, corresponding to the molecular weight of SERCA3 (Krizaj et al, 2004).…”
Section: Serca3 Signal In Cone Photoreceptorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6E) at the level of the connecting cilium and the anatomical substrate for this IS staining remains to be determined. Given the canonical view of Ca 2+ regulation in photoreceptor outer segments (Fain et al, 2001;Korenbrot and Rebrik, 2002), the staining of outer segments of cones by the SERCA3 antibody was unexpected. Several lines of evidence suggest that the antigen recognition by N89, the SERCA3 antibody, was specific: (1) Western blots from whole mouse retinas probed with the SERCA3 antibody showed a distinct band at 97 kDa, corresponding to the molecular weight of SERCA3 (Krizaj et al, 2004).…”
Section: Serca3 Signal In Cone Photoreceptorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ca 2+ extrusion in cone OS is about six-fold faster than in rods (integration time in cones is ~ 50 msec; Nakatani and Yau, 1989; reviewed in Korenbrot and Rebrik, 2002). Ca 2+ decay in cones may be faster than in rods due to greater surface-to-volume ratio of cone OSs or some difference in the properties of NCKX exchangers and/or buffering proteins.…”
Section: Functional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the latter, rod/ cone differences in release kinetics are not explained by the contribution of CICR to synaptic release from rods [136]. Akin to the outer segment in which differences in mechanisms of calcium homeostasis contribute to the ability of cones to respond more rapidly than rods to light [11], differences in intraterminal calcium handling and calcium-dependent enzymes also help to shape differences in the kinetics of release by rods and cones.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The light responses of cones are five to ten times faster than those of rods [7][8][9], resulting in a higher flicker fusion frequency for cones than rods [10]. Rod/cone differences in light response kinetics involve rod/cone differences in outer segment Ca 2+ homeostasis as well as faster inactivation of transduction cascade enzymes in cones [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differential characteristics can be attributed, in part, to differences in Ca 2+ handling processes and suggest that rods and cones possess different NCKX isoforms (30). The cloning of NCKX2 from chicken retina, which is abundant in cone photoreceptors, suggested a role for this exchanger in cone physiology that was analogous to that of NCKX1 in rod photoreceptors (47).…”
Section: Structure and Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%