2021
DOI: 10.1002/adem.202001339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning Mechanical Properties in Polycrystalline Solids Using a Deep Generative Framework

Abstract: Crystalline solids, which often possess distinguished mechanical properties among distinct orientations, may be potentially further recombined into various composite materials as an effective design strategy. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Among different types of composite design methods, better mechanical properties may be achieved by making use of the anisotropy and grain boundary effects seen in nanomaterials. [7][8][9] Considering any given space of a material, there is potential for microstructural design to improve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generative neural network models can also be used to generate de novo protein designs (Figure 9) with specific mechanical behaviors by coupling it with coarse grained analysis and has been demonstrated to solve the inverse problem of correlating and tuning polycrystalline materials to mechanical properties in which this framework can be used to guide de novo biomaterial design. 360 Similar approaches to what has been accomplished previously can be taken by studying DESs. A model could be developed that is capable of both understanding DESs and even discovering new DESs.…”
Section: Computational and Artificial Intelligence Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generative neural network models can also be used to generate de novo protein designs (Figure 9) with specific mechanical behaviors by coupling it with coarse grained analysis and has been demonstrated to solve the inverse problem of correlating and tuning polycrystalline materials to mechanical properties in which this framework can be used to guide de novo biomaterial design. 360 Similar approaches to what has been accomplished previously can be taken by studying DESs. A model could be developed that is capable of both understanding DESs and even discovering new DESs.…”
Section: Computational and Artificial Intelligence Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the optimization may be stuck in sub-optimal when using some gradient-based topology optimization methods. Recently, optimization with machine learning (ML) methods has been proposed in material design for computational efficiencies [26] as well as capacity of overcoming local minima [27]. Gu and her colleagues designed composite materials with better quality using generative deep neural network [28] and deep reinforcement learning [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the computational side, deep-learning models 20 , specifically, represent a promising alternative to physics-based models for materials design, providing much faster (several orders of magnitude) yet accurate structure-property relationship predictions, thus allowing efficient design space exploration [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] . From composites [29][30][31][32][33] , through complex symmetric architectured materials 34 , stretchable kirigami-inspired-cut materials 35,36 , spinodoid metamaterials 37 , up to polycrystalline solids 38 , several studies have attempted to solve the inverse design problem exploiting the powerful computational and predictive capabilities provided by deep-learning techniques, mainly deep neural networks, used either as generative 31,36,39,40 or surrogate forward models coupled with other optimization methods 32,41 (e.g., evolutionary algorithms). Yet, only a few studies have provided solutions for the inverse design of truss lattice materials, mainly focusing on (i) pre-existing architectures conveniently modified to obtain lattices with desired properties, such as tunable stiffness anisotropy 42 and stronger micro-lattices with arranged defects 43 ; (ii) single complex 3D novel unit cells with load carrying applications, such as stronger lattice cores for sandwich structures 44,45 ; (iii) basic architectures (such as a square lattice), on which reinforcements are non-uniformly added in order to match the desired mechanical response from a database 46 ; (iv) targeted linear properties (in solid mechanics terms), such as lattice' stiffness 39,41,42,47 and Poisson's ratio 48 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth underlying that the idea of combining an ML model with a genetic algorithm to solve inverse problems is not new in general 24,32,41,49 . In solid mechanics, specifically, strong yet tough polycrystalline materials subject to complex fracture mechanisms 38,50 (e.g., crack branching) as well as stiff and strong digital composites 32 have been inverse-designed by exploiting deep learning models as efficient surrogate solvers combined with genetic algorithms. We hence take advantage of the demonstrated ability of this combined model to discover highperforming designs in complex mechanics applications and simplicity, applying it in a bottom-up framework to inversedesign truss lattices undergoing high nonlinear phenomena (see next).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%