2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.103.174414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in ferrimagnetic GdCo: A first-principles approach

Abstract: We present a systematic analysis of our ability to tune chiral Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interactions (DMI) in compensated ferrimagnetic Pt/GdCo/Pt1−xWx trilayers by cap layer composition. Using first principles calculations, we show that the DMI increases rapidly for only ∼ 10% W and saturates thereafter, in agreement with experiments. The calculated DMI shows a spread in values around the experimental mean, depending on the atomic configuration of the cap layer interface. The saturation is attributed to the vani… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[48] The spins of CoGd layers were arranged in opposite chirality (clockwise and anticlockwise) and the total energy difference between the two configurations was taken to obtain the DMI strength as employed in previous studies. [49,50] Structural and computational details of these calculations are described in the recent paper by Morshed et al [46] For the calculations, two monolayers of Co x Gd 1-x (0.46 nm, x =75%) were used and the results were scaled to a 5-nm thick CoGd layer considering the DMI was an interfacial interaction and was inversely proportional to the thickness as experimentally demonstrated in CoGd films by Quessab et al [23] Statistical Analysis: Saturation magnetization values were obtained from magnetic hysteresis loops (VSM data) after linear subtraction of the paramagnetic contribution of the substrate. SOT phase diagrams were measured at least three times and the current-induced change of anomalous Hall resistance was normalized to the total change of anomalous Hall resistance induced by an out-of-plane magnetic field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[48] The spins of CoGd layers were arranged in opposite chirality (clockwise and anticlockwise) and the total energy difference between the two configurations was taken to obtain the DMI strength as employed in previous studies. [49,50] Structural and computational details of these calculations are described in the recent paper by Morshed et al [46] For the calculations, two monolayers of Co x Gd 1-x (0.46 nm, x =75%) were used and the results were scaled to a 5-nm thick CoGd layer considering the DMI was an interfacial interaction and was inversely proportional to the thickness as experimentally demonstrated in CoGd films by Quessab et al [23] Statistical Analysis: Saturation magnetization values were obtained from magnetic hysteresis loops (VSM data) after linear subtraction of the paramagnetic contribution of the substrate. SOT phase diagrams were measured at least three times and the current-induced change of anomalous Hall resistance was normalized to the total change of anomalous Hall resistance induced by an out-of-plane magnetic field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These calculations were generalized from the four-state energy mapping calculation of antisymmetric exchange interaction conducted by Xiang et al 49,50 . The validity of this method has been explored by several authors in different magnetic materials classes, including interfaces and bulk materials which gives confidence in applying these approaches in the current work 30,48,[51][52][53][54][55] . In general, the energy due to DMI can be written as 30,48,51,54,55 ,…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The validity of this method has been explored by several authors in different magnetic materials classes, including interfaces and bulk materials which gives confidence in applying these approaches in the current work 30,48,[51][52][53][54][55] . In general, the energy due to DMI can be written as 30,48,51,54,55 ,…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations