“…To address the above-mentioned challenges, substantial efforts have been devoted to exploring various catalysts, such as noble metals (e.g., Ru, Pd, and Au), − transition metals (e.g., oxides, sulfides, nitrides, and carbides), − and nonmetals. − Among these candidate catalysts, Ru-based materials as a second-generation NH 3 catalyst have exhibited great promise for eNRR owing to the appropriate N 2 adsorption energy and considerably lower required potential than that of other nonmetals and metals. − Furthermore, the performance of catalysts has been promoted by engineering morphology and constructing electronic structures. − Recently, single-atom catalysts (SACs) have stimulated tremendous interest in electrocatalysis attributed to their maximal atomic utilization efficiency and unique electronic structure, potentially driving intrinsic high eNRR activity. ,, Although various strategies for atomic/electronic structure modulation have been explored (such as high entropy, , symmetry breaking, , amorphous support, , alloying, , and synergistic effect, , Figure S2), traditional SACs are restricted to unidirectional electronic structure regulation (Figure S3), leading to either a unidirectional delocalization or localization of electrons at active sites. As a result, the electronic structure that achieves optimal NH 3 activity is confined to a very narrow overpotential range (∼0.1 V, Figure a). , As the overpotential shifts further negative, the eNRR sites transition to HER sites due to unidirectional electron capture, leading to a sharp decline in the NH 3 yield rate and FE.…”