2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2020.103509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning and sensitivity analysis of a hexapod state estimator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the designed dynamic-based controllers mainly contained the definition of the interactions of the feet and used kinematic models for the rest of the control. One emergent solution for this problem was the implementation of predictive models to estimate the stability of the hexapod [9], its posture [27] or the safety of the ground through the value of the contact forces [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the designed dynamic-based controllers mainly contained the definition of the interactions of the feet and used kinematic models for the rest of the control. One emergent solution for this problem was the implementation of predictive models to estimate the stability of the hexapod [9], its posture [27] or the safety of the ground through the value of the contact forces [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [27] also used a Kalman filter to estimate the pose of the hexapod when walking across surfaces perpendicular to the ground. This algorithm estimated and corrected the body posture through the data provided by an IMU, the contact forces and the position of each joint and obtained better results than the respective dynamic model of the robot, even when foot slippage occurred.…”
Section: Kinematic-based Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the tripod gait to the pentagonal gait, although the robot slows down, the attitude fluctuation and yaw also basically decrease, which means the stability of the robot's motion is better. Since the quadrangular gait and the pentagonal gait require more steps, it may make the robot foot slip phenomenon more obvious to a certain extent, and increase the robot's walking distance error [36]. Combing the actual needs, users can set suitable gait types and parameters on the mobile device.…”
Section: Comparison and Transformation Of Different Types Of Gaitmentioning
confidence: 99%