2006
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/39/18/021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuneable nonlinearity in atomic response to a bichromatic field

Abstract: Atomic response to a probe beam can be tailored, by creating coherences between atomic levels with help of another beam. Changing parameters of the control beam will change the nature of coherences and hence the nature of atomic response as well. Such change can depend upon intensity of both probe and control beams, in a nonlinear fashion. We present a situation where this nonlinearity in dependence can be precisely controlled, as to obtain different variations as desired. We also present a detailed analysis o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When both the π and σ lasers are simultaneously present in Figure 1, the system goes into a unique eigenstate involving all three states, which is of interest to the rest of the communication (Vudayagiri and Tewari, 2006;Vudayagiri, 2011). This unique state is the dressed state of the six-state Hamiltonian,…”
Section: Case Iii: Both π and σ Combinedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When both the π and σ lasers are simultaneously present in Figure 1, the system goes into a unique eigenstate involving all three states, which is of interest to the rest of the communication (Vudayagiri and Tewari, 2006;Vudayagiri, 2011). This unique state is the dressed state of the six-state Hamiltonian,…”
Section: Case Iii: Both π and σ Combinedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 is a combination of two trap states |ψ 0 〉 and |ψ − 〉. This combined state is also a trap state and will not evolve further (Vudayagiri and Tewari, 2006). In the form given in Eq.…”
Section: Case Iii: Both π and σ Combinedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two trap states |ψ 0 = |g 0 and |ψ − can now be mapped to the qubit states |ψ 0 = |0 and |ψ − = |1 . More interestingly, if both E p and E z beams are present together, the steady-state solution is not a statistical mixture of the two trap states |ψ 0 and |ψ − , but a three-component CPT states [7] …”
Section: The Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More interestingly, if both E p and E z beams are present together, the steady state solution then is not a statistical mixture of the two trap states |ψ 0 and |ψ − , but a three component CPT states [7]…”
Section: The Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that the probe field is typically treated as a weak field and the control field as a strong field, such that perturbation theory can be employed to derive the linear effect of the atomic medium on the probe field propagation. There have been theoretical and experimental studies where the probe is not necessarily weak [26][27][28]. In this situation, the effect of the atomic coherence on the propagation dynamics of the control field need to be taken into account [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%