2016
DOI: 10.3390/ma10010014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuneable Giant Magnetocaloric Effect in (Mn,Fe)2(P,Si) Materials by Co-B and Ni-B Co-Doping

Abstract: Abstract:The influence of Co (Ni) and B co-doping on the structural, magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) compounds is investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential scanning calorimetry, magnetic and direct temperature change measurements. It is found that Co (Ni) and B co-doping is an effective approach to tune both the Curie temperature and the thermal hysteresis of (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) materials without losing either the giant magnetocaloric effect or the positive effect of the B s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Materials containing highly toxic arsenic include MnAs [123,131,210,238,245,246,256,265,273,276,282,289] and MnFe(P,As) [48,49,239,298]. However, interest is shifting towards less toxic materials without As, such as (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) [125,126,150] doped with Ge [109,205] or B [184,201,215]. Examples with toxic antimony include Mn 1.9 Co 0.1 Sb [211], Mn 2−x Cr x Sb [236], NiMn 0.9 Sb 0.1 [254], Ni 0.5−x Co x Mn 0.38 Sb 0.12 [92], etc.…”
Section: ∆S T T C (K) ∆T S (K)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Materials containing highly toxic arsenic include MnAs [123,131,210,238,245,246,256,265,273,276,282,289] and MnFe(P,As) [48,49,239,298]. However, interest is shifting towards less toxic materials without As, such as (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) [125,126,150] doped with Ge [109,205] or B [184,201,215]. Examples with toxic antimony include Mn 1.9 Co 0.1 Sb [211], Mn 2−x Cr x Sb [236], NiMn 0.9 Sb 0.1 [254], Ni 0.5−x Co x Mn 0.38 Sb 0.12 [92], etc.…”
Section: ∆S T T C (K) ∆T S (K)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former is described by large magnetic entropy variations, considerable hysteresis, a narrow temperature range, and a strong correlation between magnetism and crystallographic structure [5,6]. Whereas the SOMT materials show no structural transition at the Curie temperature (T C ) that could improve the magnetization change, and they have negligible hysteresis, lower magnetic entropy change peaks and a wide temperature range [7][8][9][10]. The main problem of magnetic phase transitions theory consists in studying the behavior of a given system in the neighborhood of the ferromagnetic (FM) to paramagnetic (PM) magnetic transition temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caloric refrigeration embraces all the cooling techniques and was founded on a physical phenomenon according to which, due to an adiabatic change in the intensity of an external field, a variation of temperature (∆T ad ) is detected in a solid-state material to which the field is applied [15,16]. The specificity of the field particularizes such effects classified as caloric; a magnetic field generates a magnetocaloric effect (MCE) [17][18][19], electric fields are associated with electrocaloric In regards to solid-state refrigeration, just two methods have been studied for the application of nanofluids in the caloric systems, and both were focused on magnetocaloric refrigeration [65,66]. Working with nanofluids in other caloric-effects-based cooling systems is still an unexplored field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%