2011 Joint Conference of the IEEE International Frequency Control and the European Frequency and Time Forum (FCS) Proceedings 2011
DOI: 10.1109/fcs.2011.5977885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunable piezoelectric MEMS resonators for real-time clock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size comparison illustrated in Table II references all MEMS-die footprints to the package size of the smallest [14], where the larger the scale factor, the smaller the die footprint. From Table II, it can be seen that the oscillator of this work is 181× smaller than its quartz-crystal counterpart and significantly smaller than previously demonstrated MEMS approaches [5] [6]. The device of this work also offers a considerably larger tuning range than the recently demonstrated piezoelectric based approach [6], and consumes less power than the smallest commercially available 32-kHz quartzbased product.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The size comparison illustrated in Table II references all MEMS-die footprints to the package size of the smallest [14], where the larger the scale factor, the smaller the die footprint. From Table II, it can be seen that the oscillator of this work is 181× smaller than its quartz-crystal counterpart and significantly smaller than previously demonstrated MEMS approaches [5] [6]. The device of this work also offers a considerably larger tuning range than the recently demonstrated piezoelectric based approach [6], and consumes less power than the smallest commercially available 32-kHz quartzbased product.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…From Table II, it can be seen that the oscillator of this work is 181× smaller than its quartz-crystal counterpart and significantly smaller than previously demonstrated MEMS approaches [5] [6]. The device of this work also offers a considerably larger tuning range than the recently demonstrated piezoelectric based approach [6], and consumes less power than the smallest commercially available 32-kHz quartzbased product. Given the favorable scaling attributes for capacitive-transduced resonators, highlighted in Section II, even more reductions in size and power consumption should be possible as better lithography becomes available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since then, much effort has been invested to optimize fabrication processes and system architecture [3], which made electromechanical resonators practical. Micro resonators are at the heart of many system applications as sensors [4], signal processing [5], frequency references and clocks [6,7], and many more.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%